Baron R, Maier C
Klinik für Neurologie, Christian-Albrechts-Universität Kiel, Germany.
Clin J Pain. 1995 Mar;11(1):63-9.
In neuropathic pain states, dynamic mechanical allodynia is mediated by large diameter A beta-fibers. We test whether ongoing peripheral C-nociceptor input is necessary to maintain central changes hypothetically responsible for A beta-mediated allodynia.
A patient with long-standing diabetes mellitus demonstrated generalized signs of painless diabetic small fiber polyneuropathy. Following mechanical trauma, the patient additionally developed a typical neuropathic pain syndrome at the arm. Despite substantial impairment of cutaneous small fiber function, he complained of severe dynamic mechanical allodynia confined to a forearm skin area.
Marstock test revealed a considerably increased cold perception threshold within the allodynic area and on the contralateral side. The patient could not perceive any warm sensation on either side. Histamine iontophoresis was not followed by any itch or pain sensations within the allodynic area or contralaterally. Nociceptive C-fiber axon reflex reactions were substantially impaired within the allodynic skin or contralaterally. Standard neurophysiological testing and quantitative vibrametry showed only mild impairment of large diameter sensory and motor fiber function at the arms. Cardiovascular reflex tests showed almost no heart rate variation indicating impairment of vagal small fiber function.
(a) Cutaneous nociceptive C-fibers do not signal dynamic mechanical allodynia. This symptom may hypothetically be due to secondary changes in the central nervous system processing that might strengthen the synaptic ties between A beta-fibers and central nociceptive pathways, or due to peripheral multiplication of primary afferent low threshold mechanoreceptor input. (b) Ongoing nociceptive C-fiber input is not necessary to maintain either hypothetical mechanism. (c) Hypothetical secondary central hyperexcitability might work autonomously without any nociceptive C-fiber input for a long time or even indefinitely in some neuropathic patients.
在神经性疼痛状态下,动态机械性异常性疼痛由大直径Aβ纤维介导。我们测试持续的外周C伤害性感受器输入对于维持假定导致Aβ介导的异常性疼痛的中枢变化是否必要。
一名患有长期糖尿病的患者表现出无痛性糖尿病性小纤维多发性神经病的一般体征。在遭受机械创伤后,该患者手臂额外出现了典型的神经性疼痛综合征。尽管皮肤小纤维功能有严重损害,但他仍抱怨局限于前臂皮肤区域的严重动态机械性异常性疼痛。
马尔施托克试验显示,异常性疼痛区域及对侧的冷觉阈值显著升高。患者双侧均无法感知任何温热感觉。在异常性疼痛区域或对侧,组胺离子透入后未出现任何瘙痒或疼痛感觉。在异常性疼痛皮肤区域或对侧,伤害性C纤维轴突反射反应严重受损。标准神经生理学测试和定量振动觉测试显示,手臂大直径感觉和运动纤维功能仅有轻度损害。心血管反射测试显示几乎没有心率变化,表明迷走神经小纤维功能受损。
(a) 皮肤伤害性C纤维并不传导动态机械性异常性疼痛。该症状可能是由于中枢神经系统处理过程中的继发性变化,这可能会加强Aβ纤维与中枢伤害性感受通路之间的突触联系,或者是由于初级传入低阈值机械感受器输入的外周增殖。(b) 持续的伤害性C纤维输入对于维持这两种假定机制并非必要。(c) 在一些神经性疼痛患者中,假定的继发性中枢性兴奋性过高可能在没有任何伤害性C纤维输入的情况下长期甚至无限期自主起作用。