Scheinin S A, Radovancević B, Kimball P, Duncan J M, Van Buren C T, Frazier O H, Kerman R
Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Tex Heart Inst J. 1995;22(1):67-71.
To determine whether an IgM-positive crossmatch adversely affects the results of heart transplantation, we conducted a retrospective study of 125 orthotopic heart transplant recipients. A direct donor-recipient crossmatch was performed retrospectively on sera from all patients by the standard National Institutes of Health (NIH) method and the antihuman globulin (AHG) procedure. The patients were then divided into 3 groups as follows. Group 1 comprised 110 patients with a negative NIH and AHG crossmatch (control group). Group 2 comprised 5 patients with a positive NIH crossmatch and a negative AHG crossmatch. Group 3 comprised 10 patients with positive NIH and AHG crossmatches. All positive crossmatches in group 3 patients converted to negative after treatment of sera with dithioerythritol, indicating that the initial result was due to IgM antibodies. All patients received standard immunosuppressive treatment. An IgM-positive crossmatch did not affect the number or severity of rejection episodes among the 3 groups, nor did it have an effect on the incidence of infection. Whereas coronary artery disease was detected by angiography in 16 of 110 patients (14.6%) in group 1 and in 1 of 10 patients (10%) in group 3 (P = NS), no patient in group 2 was affected. Actuarial survival at 1 and 2 years post-transplant was significantly better for patients with an IgM-positive crossmatch (group 2) (100% survival at 2 years) than for patients with a negative crossmatch (group 1) (73% at 1 year and 71% at 2 years, P < 0.05). Based on our study, the effect of an IgM-positive crossmatch on survival is difficult to interpret because of the small sample size. An IgM-positive crossmatch, however;did not appear to have a deleterious effect on survival. It may be that the IgM antibody has an immunoregulatory role. A larger series of patients with positive crossmatches and longer follow-up will be necessary to evaluate the importance of these results.
为了确定IgM阳性交叉配型是否会对心脏移植结果产生不利影响,我们对125例原位心脏移植受者进行了一项回顾性研究。采用美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)的标准方法和抗人球蛋白(AHG)程序,对所有患者的血清进行了回顾性直接供受者交叉配型。然后将患者分为以下3组。第1组包括110例NIH和AHG交叉配型阴性的患者(对照组)。第2组包括5例NIH交叉配型阳性而AHG交叉配型阴性的患者。第3组包括10例NIH和AHG交叉配型均为阳性的患者。第3组患者所有阳性交叉配型在用二硫苏糖醇处理血清后均转为阴性,表明初始结果是由IgM抗体引起的。所有患者均接受标准免疫抑制治疗。IgM阳性交叉配型对3组患者排斥反应的次数或严重程度均无影响,对感染发生率也无影响。第1组110例患者中有16例(14.6%)通过血管造影检测到冠状动脉疾病,第3组10例患者中有1例(10%)(P=无显著性差异),而第2组无患者受影响。移植后1年和2年时,IgM阳性交叉配型患者(第2组)的精算生存率(2年生存率为100%)显著高于交叉配型阴性患者(第1组)(1年时为73%,2年时为71%,P<0.05)。基于我们的研究,由于样本量小,IgM阳性交叉配型对生存率的影响难以解释。然而,IgM阳性交叉配型似乎对生存率没有有害影响。可能IgM抗体具有免疫调节作用。需要对更多交叉配型阳性的患者进行更大规模的研究并进行更长时间的随访,以评估这些结果的重要性。