Guideline interpretation varies.
作者信息
Egan T G
出版信息
Can Fam Physician. 1995 Apr;41:559-61.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Guideline interpretation varies.指南解读因人而异。
Can Fam Physician. 1995 Apr;41:559-61.
2
Opioids for chronic pain: taking stock.用于慢性疼痛的阿片类药物：现状评估。
Pain. 2006 Nov;125(1-2):3-4. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.07.005. Epub 2006 Aug 23.
3
A proposal to recognize a legal obligation on physicians to provide adequate medication to alleviate pain.一项承认医生有提供足够药物以减轻疼痛的法定义务的提议。
J Law Health. 1997;12(2):381-405.
4
Pain management.疼痛管理
Va Med Q. 1997 Fall;124(4):222-3.
5
A research-based guideline for appropriate use of transdermal fentanyl to treat chronic pain.一项关于合理使用透皮芬太尼治疗慢性疼痛的循证指南。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1998 Oct;25(9):1505-13.
6
Chronic pain management in older adults: with coxibs under fire, what now?老年人慢性疼痛管理：昔布类药物备受指责，现在该怎么办？
Geriatrics. 2005 May;60(5):26-8, 30-1.
7
Optimizing the use of patient data to improve outcomes for patients: narcotics for chronic noncancer pain.优化患者数据的使用以改善患者结局：用于慢性非癌性疼痛的麻醉药品
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2009 Apr;9(2):171-9. doi: 10.1586/erp.09.7.
8
Chronic pain and opioids: dispelling myths and exploring the facts.慢性疼痛与阿片类药物：破除迷思，探寻真相。
Prof Nurse. 2003 Mar;18(7):408-11.
9
Spinal narcotics for chronic noncancer pain warrants further investigation.用于慢性非癌性疼痛的脊髓麻醉剂值得进一步研究。
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1994 Jun;94(6):477-8.
10
No pain, no gain? The Agency for Health Care Policy & Research's attempt to change inefficient health care practice of withholding medication from patients in pain.一分耕耘，一分收获？医疗保健政策与研究机构试图改变不给疼痛患者用药这种低效的医疗行为。
J Contemp Health Law Policy. 1994 Spring;10:383-403.
本文引用的文献
1
Model of scientific reasoning.科学推理模型。
Can Fam Physician. 1995 Jan;41:9, 11-2, 17-9.
Zotero 插件