Moscato G, Galdi E, Scibilia J, Dellabianca A, Omodeo P, Vittadini G, Biscaldi G P
Specialization School of Allergology and Clinical Immunology, University of Pavia, Italy.
Eur Respir J. 1995 Mar;8(3):467-9. doi: 10.1183/09031936.95.08030467.
A 28 year old man with no history of atopy was referred to our hospital for possible work-related asthma. He had been employed in the production section of a pharmaceutical company for 2 yrs, and in the last 2 months he had complained of dyspnoea, wheezing, chest tightness, symptoms of rhinitis and a cutaneous rash when exposed to powdered antibiotics. Symptoms disappeared after being transferred to the packaging section. When the subject was admitted to our department he was asymptomatic. Basal lung function tests were in the normal range. Bronchial challenges with methacholine and with ultrasonically-nebulized distilled water were negative. Skin-prick test with piperacillin sodium gave a strong positive response at a very low concentration. Specific inhalation challenge with piperacillin sodium resulted in an immediate asthmatic reaction, and also reproduced rhinitis symptoms and the cutaneous rash. A control challenge with lactose, and the specific challenge test with cefuroxime sodium (another antibiotic to which the patient was exposed at the workplace) were negative. We conclude that piperacillin sodium is an agent that can cause occupational asthma.
一名28岁无特应性病史的男性因可能的职业性哮喘被转诊至我院。他在一家制药公司生产部门工作了2年,在过去2个月里,他抱怨在接触粉状抗生素时出现呼吸困难、喘息、胸闷、鼻炎症状和皮疹。调至包装部门后症状消失。该患者入院时无症状。基础肺功能测试在正常范围内。用乙酰甲胆碱和超声雾化蒸馏水进行的支气管激发试验均为阴性。用哌拉西林钠进行皮肤点刺试验,在极低浓度下即出现强阳性反应。用哌拉西林钠进行特异性吸入激发试验导致即刻哮喘反应,还再现了鼻炎症状和皮疹。用乳糖进行的对照激发试验以及用头孢呋辛钠(患者在工作场所接触的另一种抗生素)进行的特异性激发试验均为阴性。我们得出结论,哌拉西林钠是一种可引起职业性哮喘的药物。