Zeimet A G, Guadagni F, Marth C, Amato T, Müller-Holzner E, Huter O, Daxenbichler G, Dapunt O
Universitätsklinik für Frauenheilkunde, Innsbruck.
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1995 Apr;55(4):195-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1023300.
The value of the TAG-72 (CA 72-4) serum marker in primary diagnosis was investigated in 110 patients with histologically diagnosed ovarian cancer. A reference group consisted of 103 patients with benign pelvic masses. Compared to the well-established CA-125, TAG-72 showed a low sensitivity of 42% in the detection of ovarian cancer. By contrast, when the cut-off level for TAG-72 was set at 6 U/ml, it showed a very high specificity of 99%. When the measurement of TAG-72 was combined to that of CA-125, improvements in both the specificity (as compared to a single CA-125 determination) and the sensitivity (as compared to a single TAG-72 assay) were observed. In such a combined assay, our results suggest that the best predictive value (positive and negative) was obtained if CA-125 is assigned a relatively high cut-off value (65 U/ml) in conjunction with a low cut-off level (3.2 U/ml or 4 U/ml) for TAG-72. In the present study, at threshold values of 65 U/ml respectively, a sensitivity of 86%, a specificity of 83% and a positive and negative predictive value of 85% were obtained. In mucinous carcinomas of the ovary, however, the additional TAG-72 determination did not lead to a better predictive power than did CA-125 measurement alone.
在110例经组织学确诊为卵巢癌的患者中,研究了TAG-72(CA 72-4)血清标志物在初步诊断中的价值。一个参照组由103例患有良性盆腔肿块的患者组成。与已广泛应用的CA-125相比,TAG-72在检测卵巢癌时显示出较低的敏感性,为42%。相比之下,当TAG-72的临界值设定为6 U/ml时,其特异性非常高,为99%。当将TAG-72的检测与CA-125的检测相结合时,观察到特异性(与单次CA-125检测相比)和敏感性(与单次TAG-72检测相比)均有所提高。在这种联合检测中,我们的结果表明,如果将CA-125设定一个相对较高的临界值(65 U/ml),同时将TAG-72设定一个较低的临界值(3.2 U/ml或4 U/ml),可获得最佳的预测价值(阳性和阴性)。在本研究中,分别在临界值为65 U/ml时,敏感性为86%,特异性为83%,阳性和阴性预测值为85%。然而,在卵巢黏液性癌中,额外检测TAG-72并未比单独检测CA-125带来更好的预测能力。