De Jong R, Coles M G, Logan G D
Department of Experimental and Occupational Psychology, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1995 Jun;21(3):498-511. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.21.3.498.
Motor inhibition was studied in 3 versions of the stop-signal paradigm, with the stop signal requiring inhibition of any response (stop-all), a fixed alternative response (stop-change), or selective inhibition of only 1 of the responses (selective-stop). The lateralized readiness potential was used in Experiment 1 to distinguish between a selective, central, and a global peripheral inhibition mechanism. Inhibition was found to be effected by the central mechanism in the stop-change condition and by the peripheral mechanism in the other conditions. Manipulation of stimulus discriminability in Experiment 2 strongly affected the speed of selective motor inhibition, confirming that such inhibition was achieved by conditionally engaging the peripheral mechanism. These results support the idea that functionally distinct mechanisms and strategies are involved in inhibitory motor control in different situations.
在三种版本的停止信号范式中研究了运动抑制,其中停止信号要求抑制任何反应(全停)、固定的替代反应(停-变)或仅抑制其中一种反应(选择性停止)。实验1中使用了侧化准备电位来区分选择性、中枢性和全身性外周抑制机制。发现在停-变条件下,抑制是由中枢机制实现的,而在其他条件下是由外周机制实现的。实验2中对刺激辨别力的操纵强烈影响了选择性运动抑制的速度,证实这种抑制是通过有条件地激活外周机制来实现的。这些结果支持了这样一种观点,即在不同情况下,功能上不同的机制和策略参与了抑制性运动控制。