Suppr超能文献

[当前快速牛奶孕酮检测方法与常规实验室方法相比的准确性]

[Accuracy of current rapid milk progesterone assays in comparison with a routine laboratory method].

作者信息

Sobiraj A, Seyrek-Intas K, Wollgarten B, Taday B

机构信息

Ambulatorischen und Geburtshilflichen Veterinärklinik, Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen.

出版信息

Tierarztl Prax. 1995 Feb;23(1):32-6.

PMID:7792772
Abstract

Four current commercially available rapid milk progesterone assays (Cowside rapid tube kit [test No. 1], Hormonost-Schnelltest Milch [test No. 2], Hygia Diagnostic RPT Progesterone Test [test No. 3] and Target-Milch-Progesterone-Schnelltest [test No. 4]) for dairy cows were tested for their accuracy in comparison with the gynecological status on the one hand and by using an approved quantitative laboratory-bound assay on the other hand. Milk samples were taken from 23 dairy cows with behavioural oestrus. From 18 species with expected intermediate levels of progesterone milk probes were taken between day 3 and day 6 post insemination and also from 26 gravid cows. The clinically established gynecological status of the dairy cows correlated completely with their milk progesterone values investigated with the laboratory-bound EIA. In contrast the accuracy levels of the rapid progesterone kits differed. The accuracy of test No. 1 was 81% regarding all milk probes, whereas test No. 2 achieved 91%, test No. 3 73.5% and test No. 4 only 69.5%. Milk samples yielding low progesterone levels partly showed big differences. The highest rates of false semiquantitative classifications were recorded in milk samples with intermediate progesterone values. Test No. 2 was the only one with satisfactory results in this range. Milk samples yielding high progesterone values proved to be the best in all four assays.

摘要

对目前市面上四种用于奶牛的快速乳孕酮检测方法(Cowside快速试管试剂盒[检测编号1]、Hormonost-Schnelltest Milch[检测编号2]、Hygia Diagnostic RPT孕酮检测[检测编号3]和Target-Milch-Progesterone-Schnelltest[检测编号4])进行了检测,一方面将其准确性与奶牛的妇科状况进行比较,另一方面与一种经认可的实验室定量检测方法进行比较。从23头有行为性发情的奶牛采集了乳样。从18头预期孕酮水平处于中等的奶牛中,在输精后第3天至第6天采集了乳样,还从26头怀孕奶牛中采集了乳样。奶牛临床确定的妇科状况与其通过实验室酶免疫分析(EIA)检测的乳孕酮值完全相关。相比之下,快速孕酮检测试剂盒的准确性水平有所不同。检测编号1针对所有乳样的准确率为81%,而检测编号2为91%,检测编号3为73.5%,检测编号4仅为69.5%。孕酮水平较低的乳样部分显示出较大差异。在孕酮值处于中等的乳样中,半定量分类的错误率最高。检测编号2是在此范围内唯一结果令人满意的检测方法。在所有四种检测方法中,孕酮值较高的乳样结果最佳。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验