Pitkäjärvi T, Ala-Laurila P, Torsti P, Ruosteenoja R
Ann Clin Res. 1976 Feb;8(1):48-54.
The antihypertensive effects of clonidine hydrochloride and practolol were compared in 42 men, aged 45 years, who had not received any antihypertensive therapy before, except one patient. The diastolic blood pressures were at least 110 mmHg on two successive visits to the health centre before their selection to the trial. One half of them were classified into the WHO group 1 and the other half into group 2. There was no statistical difference in the systolic and diastolic blood pressures between clonidine and practolol group at the end of placebo period. The study started with a three-week placebo period. Thereafter, 20 patients were given clonidine 0.225 mg and twenty-two practolol 200 mg daily. The next control was carried out after three weeks. The dosage was kept unchanged or increased according to the antihypertensive response. After three weeks, clonidine and practolol dosages were checked again, and 25 mg of chlorothiazide were added to the treatment in 15 clonidine cases and in 18 practolol cases. After the next three-week period, the same regimen was continued on most patients for 6-9 weeks. The daily dosage of clonidine varied from 0.225 to 0.900 (mean 0.394) mg and that of practolol from 200 to 600 (mean 382) mg. Both regimens resulted, when individually adjusted, in a mean systolic blood pressure level of less than 150 mmHg and diastolic pressures less than or equal to 100 mmHg. Hydrochlorothiazide potentiated the blood pressure effect almost equally in both regimens. The blood pressure reduction was statistically significant (p less than 0.05) both in the clonidine and practolol group. There was no significant difference of the mean blood pressures after the active drug therapy between these two groups. A moderate reduction of pulse rate was observed in both main groups, but it was not related to the antihypertensive efficacy. Side-effects were mild. Dryness of the mouth and sedation were more common in patients receiving clonidine. No oculocutaneous or other "immunological" manifestation were seen during the 15-18 weeks' practolol therapy.
对42名45岁男性(除1名患者外,此前均未接受过任何抗高血压治疗)比较了盐酸可乐定和心得宁的降压效果。入选试验前,他们连续两次到健康中心就诊时舒张压至少为110 mmHg。其中一半被归类为世界卫生组织第1组,另一半为第2组。在安慰剂期结束时,可乐定组和心得宁组的收缩压和舒张压无统计学差异。研究从为期三周的安慰剂期开始。此后,20名患者每日服用0.225 mg可乐定,22名患者每日服用200 mg心得宁。三周后进行下一次对照。根据降压反应保持剂量不变或增加。三周后,再次检查可乐定和心得宁的剂量,15例可乐定治疗患者和18例心得宁治疗患者在治疗中加用25 mg氢氯噻嗪。再过三周后,大多数患者继续相同方案治疗6 - 9周。可乐定的日剂量为0.225至0.900(平均0.394)mg,心得宁为200至600(平均382)mg。两种方案经个体化调整后,平均收缩压水平均低于150 mmHg,舒张压低于或等于100 mmHg。氢氯噻嗪在两种方案中对血压的增强作用几乎相同。可乐定组和心得宁组的血压降低均有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。两组在活性药物治疗后的平均血压无显著差异。两个主要组均观察到脉搏率有适度降低,但与降压疗效无关。副作用较轻。接受可乐定治疗的患者口干和镇静更为常见。在心得宁治疗的15 - 18周期间未出现眼皮肤或其他“免疫”表现。