Suppr超能文献

标准化高糖早餐试验在餐后反应性低血糖中的评估

Evaluation of a standardized hyperglucidic breakfast test in postprandial reactive hypoglycaemia.

作者信息

Brun J F, Fédou C, Bouix O, Raynaud E, Orsetti A

机构信息

Service d'Exploration Physiologique des Hormones et des Métabolismes, Hôpital Lapeyronie, Montpellier, France.

出版信息

Diabetologia. 1995 Apr;38(4):494-501. doi: 10.1007/BF00410289.

Abstract

The oral glucose tolerance test is not specific for diagnosing postprandial reactive hypoglycaemia, since it too frequently induces low blood glucose values in subjects who have never complained of symptoms of this. By contrast, the mixed meal tests are deceptive for this purpose because they do not induce hypoglycaemia in subjects who have complained of of hypoglycaemic symptoms. We investigated the frequency of hypoglycaemia after a standardized hyperglucidic breakfast test in three groups of subjects:group A, 43 control subjects; group B, 38 postprandial reactive hypoglycaemic patients; group C, 1193 asymptomatic subjects undergoing assessment of glycoregulation. In the 38 subjects with suspected reactive hypoglycaemia the mean blood glucose nadir was 3.48 +/- 0.08 mmol/l, i.e. lower than in control subjects (4.83 +/- 0.13 p < 0.0001). Blood glucose levels less than 3.3 mmol/l were found in 47.3% of subjects with suspected postprandial reactive hypoglycaemia (group B), i.e more frequently than in control subjects (group A: 2.2% p = 1.6 x 10(-6)) and asymptomatic subjects (group C: 1% p = 8 x 10(-22)). This markedly higher frequency of low blood glucose values in subjects with postprandial symptoms compared with control and asymptomatic subjects suggests that this test detects a tendency to hypoglycaemia after a standardized hyperglucidic breakfast. Since this test mimics average French eating habits, the results suggest that the patients undergo such symptoms in their everyday life, and that the hyperglucidic breakfast test is a simple alternative to ambulatory glucose sampling for diagnosis of postprandial reactive hypoglycaemia.

摘要

口服葡萄糖耐量试验对于诊断餐后反应性低血糖并不具有特异性,因为它常常会在从未有过此类症状的受试者中诱发低血糖值。相比之下,混合餐试验在此目的上具有误导性,因为它不会在有低血糖症状的受试者中诱发低血糖。我们在三组受试者中研究了标准化高糖早餐试验后低血糖的发生频率:A组,43名对照受试者;B组,38名餐后反应性低血糖患者;C组,1193名接受血糖调节评估的无症状受试者。在38名疑似反应性低血糖的受试者中,平均血糖最低点为3.48±0.08 mmol/L,即低于对照受试者(4.83±0.13,p<0.0001)。在疑似餐后反应性低血糖的受试者(B组)中,47.3%的人血糖水平低于3.3 mmol/L,即比对照受试者(A组:2.2%,p = 1.6×10⁻⁶)和无症状受试者(C组:1%,p = 8×10⁻²²)更频繁。与对照和无症状受试者相比,餐后有症状的受试者中低血糖值的频率明显更高,这表明该试验检测到标准化高糖早餐后有低血糖倾向。由于该试验模拟了法国的平均饮食习惯,结果表明患者在日常生活中会出现此类症状,并且高糖早餐试验是一种简单的替代动态血糖采样的方法,用于诊断餐后反应性低血糖。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验