• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于椎弓根螺钉固定装置疲劳测试的方法。

A method for the fatigue testing of pedicle screw fixation devices.

作者信息

Goel V K, Winterbottom J M, Weinstein J N

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242.

出版信息

J Biomech. 1994 Nov;27(11):1383-8. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(94)90048-5.

DOI:10.1016/0021-9290(94)90048-5
PMID:7798289
Abstract

Spinal devices/instrumentation are used to augment the stability of a decompressed spinal segment during surgery. Like any other mechanical component, the device can fail. A standard in vitro test protocol, was developed to determine load vs number of cycles to failure curve for a pedicle screw-plate/rod type spinal device. The protocol based on the use of an 'artificial spine' model, is clinically relevant. The protocol was used to characterize the load-carrying capacities and failure modes of a specific pedicle screw-rod type fixation device to demonstrate its appropriateness. The devices (Kaneda) were tested in the quasi-static as well as fatigue bending modes. In the bending fatigue mode, the devices failed at loads significantly smaller than the corresponding quasi-static failure load magnitude (806 N). The device exhibited an endurance limit in the fatigue bending mode. The device is not likely to exhibit failure if subjected to cyclic loads which cause less than 380 N axial compression (and an accompanying bending moment relative to the device of less than 13.57 Nm). The failures observed in specimens subjected to the fatigue tests ranged from complete to partial breakage of the paraspinal rods as opposed to failure due to permanent deformation (yielding) of the rods in the quasi-static bending test specimens. The protocol developed can be used for any other screw-plate/rod type spinal instrumentation. The use of a standard protocol by researchers would enable a comparison of various devices currently available in the market. Such comparative data would be useful for the scientific community, and agencies such as the FDA and ASTM.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

脊柱器械/植入物用于在手术期间增强减压脊柱节段的稳定性。与任何其他机械部件一样,该器械可能会失效。已制定了一项标准体外测试方案,以确定椎弓根螺钉-钢板/杆型脊柱器械的载荷与失效循环次数曲线。基于“人工脊柱”模型的该方案具有临床相关性。该方案用于表征特定椎弓根螺钉-杆型固定器械的承载能力和失效模式,以证明其适用性。对这些器械(Kaneda)进行了准静态以及疲劳弯曲模式测试。在弯曲疲劳模式下,器械在远小于相应准静态失效载荷大小(806 N)的载荷下失效。该器械在疲劳弯曲模式下表现出疲劳极限。如果承受小于380 N轴向压缩(以及相对于器械小于13.57 Nm的伴随弯矩)的循环载荷,该器械不太可能出现失效。在疲劳测试的标本中观察到的失效范围从椎旁杆的完全断裂到部分断裂,这与准静态弯曲测试标本中杆因永久变形(屈服)而失效不同。所制定的方案可用于任何其他螺钉-钢板/杆型脊柱植入器械。研究人员使用标准方案将能够比较市场上目前可用的各种器械。此类比较数据将对科学界以及美国食品药品监督管理局和美国材料与试验协会等机构有用。(摘要截断于250字)

相似文献

1
A method for the fatigue testing of pedicle screw fixation devices.一种用于椎弓根螺钉固定装置疲劳测试的方法。
J Biomech. 1994 Nov;27(11):1383-8. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(94)90048-5.
2
Mechanical performance of the new posterior spinal implant: effect of materials, connecting plate, and pedicle screw design.新型后路脊柱植入物的力学性能:材料、连接板和椎弓根螺钉设计的影响。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 May 1;28(9):881-6; discussion 887. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000058718.38533.B8.
3
Static and cyclical biomechanical analysis of pedicle screw spinal constructs.椎弓根螺钉脊柱内固定结构的静态和循环生物力学分析
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993 Sep 15;18(12):1677-88. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199309000-00017.
4
Biomechanical assessment of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anterior lumbosacral fixation screw-plate: comparison to stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and anterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in an unstable human cadaver model.使用前路腰骶固定螺钉钢板进行腰椎前路椎间融合术的生物力学评估:与单纯腰椎前路椎间融合术及在不稳定人体尸体模型中使用椎弓根螺钉进行腰椎前路椎间融合术的比较。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Apr 1;31(7):762-8. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000206360.83728.d2.
5
Biomechanical analysis of posterior fixation techniques in a 360 degrees arthrodesis model.360度关节融合模型中后路固定技术的生物力学分析
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Dec 15;30(24):2765-71. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000190814.11514.5e.
6
Multiaxial pedicle screw designs: static and dynamic mechanical testing.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Feb 15;29(4):367-75. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000092369.50397.85.
7
Biomechanical comparison of costotransverse process screw fixation and pedicle screw fixation of the upper thoracic spine.胸上段脊柱肋横突关节螺钉固定与椎弓根螺钉固定的生物力学比较
Neurosurgery. 2010 Mar;66(3 Suppl Operative):178-82; discussion 182. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000350869.35779.05.
8
Design and biomechanical study of a modified pedicle screw.一种改良椎弓根螺钉的设计与生物力学研究
Chin J Traumatol. 2010 Aug 1;13(4):222-8.
9
Biomechanical testing of a unique built-in expandable anterior spinal internal fixation system.一种独特的内置可扩张前路脊柱内固定系统的生物力学测试
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Dec 11;15:424. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-424.
10
The effects of rod contouring on spinal construct fatigue strength.棒材塑形对脊柱内固定器械疲劳强度的影响。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Jul 1;31(15):1680-7. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000224177.97846.00.

引用本文的文献

1
Incomplete insertion of pedicle screws in a standard construct reduces the fatigue life: A biomechanical analysis.标准构建中椎弓根螺钉不完全插入会降低疲劳寿命:一项生物力学分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 1;14(11):e0224699. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224699. eCollection 2019.
2
Timing of PMMA cement application for pedicle screw augmentation affects screw anchorage.聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)骨水泥用于椎弓根螺钉强化的时机影响螺钉锚固。
Eur Spine J. 2017 Nov;26(11):2883-2890. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5053-3. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
3
A pedicle screw system and a lamina hook system provide similar primary and long-term stability: a biomechanical in vitro study with quasi-static and dynamic loading conditions.
椎弓根螺钉系统和椎板钩系统提供相似的初始稳定性和长期稳定性:一项在准静态和动态加载条件下的体外生物力学研究。
Eur Spine J. 2016 Sep;25(9):2919-28. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4679-x. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
4
Effect of augmentation techniques on the failure of pedicle screws under cranio-caudal cyclic loading.在头尾向循环加载下,增强技术对椎弓根螺钉失效的影响。
Eur Spine J. 2017 Jan;26(1):181-188. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3904-3. Epub 2015 Mar 27.