Sass H, Herpertz S, Houben I
Psychiatric Clinic of Technical University of Aachen, Germany.
Jpn J Psychiatry Neurol. 1994;48 Suppl:5-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.1994.tb03033.x.
The historical roots of the concepts of abnormal personality, social deviance, delinquency and penal responsibility are described, demonstrating that former concepts of psychopathic personality often included negative social evaluations. Modern classification systems such as DSM-III-R and ICD-10 prefer a behavior-oriented definition of personality disorders, which increases reliability but may lead to a reductionistic and purely criteriological assessment of personality. A checklist for the assessment of personality disorders (AMPS) according to ICD-10 and DSM-III-R is presented, including four subaffective forms derived from the typology of personality disorders described by Kurt Schneider and Kretschmer. To justify statements of diminished legal responsibility or irresponsibility under the German Penal Code, a differentiation between psychopathological phenomena in personality disorders and pure social deviance is needed. The three notions of psychopathy, sociopathy and dissocial behavior are suggested to guide necessary decisions concerning prognosis and therapy chances.
本文描述了异常人格、社会偏差、犯罪及刑事责任等概念的历史根源,表明以往的精神病态人格概念往往包含负面的社会评价。现代分类系统如《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本(DSM-III-R)和《国际疾病分类》第十版(ICD-10)更倾向于采用以行为为导向的人格障碍定义,这提高了可靠性,但可能导致对人格的简化和纯粹基于标准的评估。本文介绍了一份根据ICD-10和DSM-III-R制定的人格障碍评估清单(AMPS),包括从库尔特·施奈德和克雷奇默描述的人格障碍类型学中衍生出的四种亚情感形式。为了证明根据《德国刑法典》减轻法律责任或无责任声明的合理性,需要区分人格障碍中的精神病理现象和纯粹的社会偏差。建议使用精神病态、反社会人格和反社会行为这三个概念来指导有关预后和治疗机会的必要决策。