• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Economic decision analysis in the diagnosis and treatment of low back pain. A methodologic primer.

作者信息

Conrad D A, Deyo R A

机构信息

Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 Sep 15;19(18 Suppl):2101S-2106S. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199409151-00013.

DOI:10.1097/00007632-199409151-00013
PMID:7801189
Abstract

This article outlines basic principles for the economic analysis of clinical decisions. Using a hypothetical scenario involving a patient with low back pain, the specific application of cost-benefit analysis (CBA) and cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) is illustrated; and the two methodologies are compared. Cost-benefit analysis is advanced in the "gold standard" among the two approaches because it forces decision makers to explicitly value both the cost and health consequences of alternative clinical actions.

摘要

相似文献

1
Economic decision analysis in the diagnosis and treatment of low back pain. A methodologic primer.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 Sep 15;19(18 Suppl):2101S-2106S. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199409151-00013.
2
It is time for physicians to embrace cost-effectiveness and cost utility analysis research in the treatment of spinal pain.现在是医生们在治疗脊柱疼痛时接受成本效益分析和成本效用分析研究的时候了。
Spine J. 2005 Jul-Aug;5(4):357-60. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2005.03.001.
3
Is exposure in vivo cost-effective for chronic low back pain? A trial-based economic evaluation.体内暴露疗法对慢性腰痛是否具有成本效益?一项基于试验的经济学评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Dec 14;15:549. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1212-6.
4
Principles of medical decision making.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999 Mar 1;24(5):493-8. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199903010-00021.
5
Cost-effectiveness of Acupuncture for Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain.针灸治疗慢性非特异性下腰痛的成本效益
Pain Pract. 2014 Sep;14(7):599-606. doi: 10.1111/papr.12116. Epub 2013 Oct 21.
6
[Decisions in case of "problematic" cost-effectiveness ratios based on the example of a clinical trial in rehabilitation care].
Gesundheitswesen. 2006 Apr;68(4):249-56. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-926717.
7
Low back pain: cost-effective diagnosis and treatment.腰痛:经济有效的诊断与治疗
Contemp Intern Med. 1995 Aug;7(8):26-36, 41-2.
8
Effectiveness and Economic Evaluation of Chiropractic Care for the Treatment of Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review of Pragmatic Studies.脊椎按摩疗法治疗腰痛的有效性和经济评估:实用研究的系统评价
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 3;11(8):e0160037. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160037. eCollection 2016.
9
Multi-factorial causative model for back pain management; relating causative factors and mechanisms to injury presentations and designing time- and cost effective treatment thereof.腰痛管理的多因素病因学模型;将病因和机制与损伤表现相关联,并设计具有成本效益的治疗方案。
Med Hypotheses. 2012 Aug;79(2):232-40. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2012.04.047. Epub 2012 May 31.
10
[Multidisciplinary outpatient care program vs. usual care : Cost-benefit analysis in patients with chronic low back pain].[多学科门诊护理计划与常规护理:慢性下腰痛患者的成本效益分析]
Schmerz. 2015 Apr;29(2):195-202. doi: 10.1007/s00482-014-1508-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Welfarism versus extra-welfarism: can the choice of economic evaluation approach impact on the adoption decisions recommended by economic evaluation studies?福利主义与超福利主义:经济评价方法的选择会影响经济评价研究推荐的采用决策吗?
Pharmacoeconomics. 2015 Jun;33(6):571-9. doi: 10.1007/s40273-015-0261-3.