• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[刺激辨别中的归纳与联想过程]

[Inductive versus associative processes in stimulus discrimination].

作者信息

Lachnit H

机构信息

Philipps-Universität Marburg.

出版信息

Z Exp Angew Psychol. 1994;41(3):415-25.

PMID:7801649
Abstract

The experiment reported here was an attempt to demonstrate that the solution of specific discrimination problems is based on rules rather than on differences in associative strengths. With positive and negative patterning as examples, we examined whether or not the solution of the discrimination problem depends on the number of reinforcements for each individual stimulus when the total number of reinforcements is kept constant. This was achieved by manipulating the number of stimuli used. We also examined the transfer to new stimuli. Forty subjects took part in a 2 x 2-factorial experiment with anticipatory skin conductance responses as the dependent variable. All the results were in accordance with the assumption of rule based problem solution. The amount of discrimination was independent of the number of reinforcements for each stimulus. Furthermore, according to results of concept formation studies, an asymmetry in transferring the solution to new stimuli was observed.

摘要

此处报告的实验旨在证明特定辨别问题的解决是基于规则,而非联想强度的差异。以正性和负性模式为例,我们研究了在强化总数保持不变的情况下,辨别问题的解决是否取决于每个单独刺激的强化次数。这是通过操纵所用刺激的数量来实现的。我们还研究了向新刺激的迁移。40名受试者参与了一项2×2析因实验,以预期皮肤电传导反应作为因变量。所有结果均符合基于规则的问题解决假设。辨别量与每个刺激的强化次数无关。此外,根据概念形成研究的结果,观察到在将解决方案迁移到新刺激时存在不对称性。

相似文献

1
[Inductive versus associative processes in stimulus discrimination].[刺激辨别中的归纳与联想过程]
Z Exp Angew Psychol. 1994;41(3):415-25.
2
[Is there a feature-positive effect in classical conditioning in humans?].[人类经典条件反射中存在特征阳性效应吗?]
Z Exp Angew Psychol. 1994;41(1):1-16.
3
Pavlovian conditioning and rule learning.
Integr Physiol Behav Sci. 1993 Apr-Jun;28(2):158-62. doi: 10.1007/BF02691220.
4
[Skin conduction as an indicator of cognitive and emotional processes].[皮肤传导作为认知和情感过程的指标]
Z Exp Angew Psychol. 1994;41(1):116-24.
5
Stimulus salience and negative patterning.刺激显著性与负性模式。
Q J Exp Psychol B. 1995 Feb;48(1):67-83.
6
Comparing elemental and configural associative theories in human causal learning: a case for attention.比较人类因果学习中的元素关联理论和构型关联理论:注意力的作用
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2008 Apr;34(2):303-13. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.34.2.303.
7
The nature and processes of preverbal learning: implications from nine-month-old infants' discrimination problem solving.前语言学习的本质与过程:来自九个月大婴儿解决辨别问题的启示
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1994;59(4):1-75; discussion 76-93.
8
Transfer effects in feature-positive and feature-negative learning by adult humans.成年人在特征阳性和特征阴性学习中的迁移效应。
Am J Psychol. 1981 Sep;94(3):417-29.
9
Implicit task sets in task switching?任务切换中的内隐任务集?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Nov;32(6):1221-33. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.6.1221.
10
The effect of age on children's learning of problems that require a configural association solution.年龄对儿童学习需要构型联想解决方案的问题的影响。
Dev Psychobiol. 1993 Apr;26(3):171-84. doi: 10.1002/dev.420260304.