Suppr超能文献

安氏II类错牙合不拔牙矫治中高位头帽矫治器治疗的头影测量评估

A cephalometric evaluation of nonextraction cervical headgear treatment in Class II malocclusions.

作者信息

Hubbard G W, Nanda R S, Currier G F

机构信息

University of Oklahoma College of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 1994;64(5):359-70. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1994)064<0359:ACEONC>2.0.CO;2.

Abstract

The effects of orthodontic treatment with the use of the cervical pull facebow headgear in patients with Class II malocclusions were evaluated with special reference to the dentition, the maxillary complex, the mandible, and the facial profile. The records of 85 patients, with a mean age of 11.3 +/- 1.7 years, were selected from a sample of 125 patient records requested from the office of John S. Kloehn in Appleton, Wisconsin. Dr. Kloehn has used traditional cervical pull facebow therapy in his practice. Over 100 linear and angular cephalometric measurements were made from the pretreatment and posttreatment records. These measurements were used to evaluate growth and/or treatment changes. The treatment sample was divided by size of the pretreatment FMA, sex, and the age range in which treatment was started, i.e., prepubertal, circumpubertal, and postpubertal. Overall, the results showed that the changes were very close to what would occur as a result of normal growth in Class I individuals. The maxillary permanent first molars continued to progress forward, the maxilla continued to grow forward, and the cranial base showed very little change, if any. The mandibular plane angle did not increase appreciably with treatment, regardless of the size of the pretreatment mandibular plane angle. Very few significant differences were found between sexes, pretreatment age groups, or between groups based on pretreatment Frankfort mandibular plane angle.

摘要

对使用颈牵引面弓矫治器治疗Ⅱ类错牙合患者的效果进行了评估,特别参考了牙列、上颌复合体、下颌骨和面部轮廓。从威斯康星州阿普尔顿市约翰·S·克洛恩办公室索要的125份患者记录样本中,选取了85例平均年龄为11.3±1.7岁患者的记录。克洛恩医生在其临床实践中采用了传统的颈牵引面弓疗法。从治疗前和治疗后的记录中进行了100多项线性和角度的头影测量。这些测量用于评估生长和/或治疗变化。治疗样本按治疗前FMA大小、性别以及开始治疗的年龄范围进行划分,即青春期前、青春期和青春期后。总体而言,结果表明这些变化与Ⅰ类个体正常生长所产生的变化非常接近。上颌第一恒磨牙继续向前移动,上颌继续向前生长,颅底即使有变化也非常小。无论治疗前下颌平面角的大小如何,治疗后下颌平面角均未明显增加。在性别、治疗前年龄组之间,或基于治疗前法兰克福下颌平面角的组间,未发现非常显著的差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验