• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

End-tidal carbon dioxide during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation: comparison of active compression-decompression and standard CPR.

作者信息

Orliaguet G A, Carli P A, Rozenberg A, Janniere D, Sauval P, Delpech P

机构信息

Service d'Aide Médicale Urgente (SAMU) de Paris, Department of Anesthesiology, Hôpital Necker.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 1995 Jan;25(1):48-51. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(95)70354-3.

DOI:10.1016/s0196-0644(95)70354-3
PMID:7802369
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To compare the maximal end-tidal carbon dioxide pressure (ETCO2 peak) values obtained during standard (S-CPR) and active compression-decompression CPR (ACD-CPR) during prolonged resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized crossover study.

SETTING

City with a population of 3.5 million, served by an emergency medical service system providing advanced cardiac life support.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomly assigned to receive first, for a period of 3 minutes, either ACD-CPR or S-CPR; then the two methods were alternated. ETCO2 was continuously monitored and computed.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Sixteen patients (48 +/- 20 years old) were included; in 12, return of spontaneous circulation was achieved, and 5 were admitted alive to the hospital. A statistically significant increase in ETCO2 peak was obtained with ACD-CPR (27.6 +/- 3 mm Hg) compared with S-CPR (15.6 +/- 2.2 mm Hg). No major adverse effect possibly related to ACD-CPR was observed.

CONCLUSION

This prospective study suggests that ACD-CPR may improve cardiac output compared with S-CPR.

摘要

相似文献

1
End-tidal carbon dioxide during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation: comparison of active compression-decompression and standard CPR.
Ann Emerg Med. 1995 Jan;25(1):48-51. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(95)70354-3.
2
Active compression-decompression. A new method of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Working Group.主动按压-减压。一种新的心肺复苏方法。心肺复苏工作组。
JAMA. 1992 Jun 3;267(21):2916-23. doi: 10.1001/jama.267.21.2916.
3
Inspiratory impedance during active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized evaluation in patients in cardiac arrest.主动按压-减压心肺复苏期间的吸气阻抗:心脏骤停患者的随机评估
Circulation. 2000 Mar 7;101(9):989-94. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.101.9.989.
4
A randomized clinical trial of active compression-decompression CPR vs standard CPR in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in two cities.在两个城市进行的院外心脏骤停患者中,主动按压-减压心肺复苏与标准心肺复苏的随机临床试验。
JAMA. 1995 Apr 26;273(16):1261-8.
5
Evaluation of active compression-decompression CPR in victims of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.院外心脏骤停患者实施主动按压-减压心肺复苏术的评估
JAMA. 1994 May 11;271(18):1405-11.
6
End-tidal carbon dioxide output in manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation versus active compression-decompression device during prehospital quality controlled resuscitation: a case series study.心肺复苏期间手动心肺复苏与主动按压-释放装置的呼气末二氧化碳输出:一项质量控制复苏的病例系列研究。
Emerg Med J. 2018 Jul;35(7):428-432. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2017-207103. Epub 2018 May 16.
7
Comparison of standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation versus the combination of active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation and an inspiratory impedance threshold device for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.院外心脏骤停时标准心肺复苏与主动按压-减压心肺复苏联合吸气阻抗阈值装置的比较。
Circulation. 2003 Nov 4;108(18):2201-5. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000095787.99180.B5. Epub 2003 Oct 20.
8
Mechanical active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ACD-CPR) versus manual CPR according to pressure of end tidal carbon dioxide (P(ET)CO2) during CPR in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).院外心脏骤停(OHCA)心肺复苏期间,根据呼气末二氧化碳分压(P(ET)CO2)比较机械主动按压-减压心肺复苏(ACD-CPR)与徒手心肺复苏。
Resuscitation. 2009 Oct;80(10):1099-103. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.08.006. Epub 2009 Aug 28.
9
Hemodynamic effects of active compression-decompression after prolonged CPR.长时间心肺复苏后主动按压-减压的血流动力学效应
Resuscitation. 1996 Jun;31(3):243-53. doi: 10.1016/0300-9572(95)00934-5.
10
Association between Prehospital CPR Quality and End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide Levels in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.院外心脏骤停患者的院前心肺复苏质量与呼气末二氧化碳水平之间的关联
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2016 May-Jun;20(3):369-77. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2015.1115929. Epub 2016 Feb 1.

引用本文的文献

1
[Not Available].[无可用内容]
Notf Rett Med. 2006;9(1):38-80. doi: 10.1007/s10049-006-0796-0. Epub 2006 Feb 1.
2
Haemodynamic outcomes during piston-based mechanical CPR with or without active decompression in a porcine model of cardiac arrest.基于活塞的机械心肺复苏术在伴有或不伴有主动减压时对心脏骤停猪模型血流动力学的影响。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018 Apr 24;26(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13049-018-0496-z.
3
Active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) versus standard CPR for cardiac arrest patients: a meta-analysis.
主动按压-减压心肺复苏(CPR)与标准 CPR 治疗心搏骤停患者的效果比较:一项荟萃分析。
World J Emerg Med. 2013;4(4):266-72. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.issn.1920-8642.2013.04.004.
4
[Mechanical resuscitation assist devices].[机械复苏辅助设备]
Anaesthesist. 2014 Mar;63(3):186-97. doi: 10.1007/s00101-013-2265-8.
5
Active chest compression-decompression for cardiopulmonary resuscitation.用于心肺复苏的主动胸外按压-减压
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 20;2013(9):CD002751. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002751.pub3.