Drews J
Infection. 1976;4(2):61-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01638718.
Acquired resistance can be defined as a qualitative alteration of the genetic material of a cell which is phenotypically correlated with a measurable decrease of the cell's sensitivity against one or several chemotherapeutic agents. There are two basic genetic mechanisms which can lead to the emergence of resistance: mutation and the acquisition of additional genetic material from another cell. Both forms of resistance play an important role in clinical situations: the emergence of resistance by mutation occurs in tumor cells and can also lead to therapeutic problems in antimicrobial chemotherapy. In bacteria, however, acquisition of resistance plasmids represents the dominating mechanism which is responsible for most therapeutic problems in the clinical environment. The different genetic mechanisms involved in the emergence of resistance are paralleled -- at least in bacteria -- by two principally different groups of biochemical mechanisms implementing resistance. Mutations lead to alterations of single cell constituents such as the cell membrane or cellular receptors necessary for the binding of the antimicrobial agent. This form of resistance is biochemically characterized by the inaccessibility of the cell interior for a particular compound or by the modification of an intracellular binding site which loses its affinity for the chemotherapeutic agent. Resistance plasmids on the other hand code for enzymes which inactivate the antibiotic (beta-lactamases, aminoglycosideinactivating enzymes, chloramphenicol-acetyltransferase); In some cases, they direct the synthesis of proteins which affect cell permeability (tetracycline) or isoenzymes which have a lower affinity for the inhibitor (trimethoprim). Resistance against antibiotics can be inducible; In these cases the regulatory mechanisms involved are stable genetical traits as resistance itself; Using chloramphenicol, beta-lactam-antibiotics and aminoglycosides as examples, it is demonstrated that resistance data gathered early in the development of a new drug are of little value in estimating the clinical potential of a new compound. Information on the rate at which resistance develops, on the pattern according to which it emerges ("single step" or "multi step") and on cross-resistance patterns is important in the characterization of a new drug but is often invalidated by later findings obtained in the clinical environment; The problem appears somewhat simpler if a new drug is a member of an already known class of compounds, e.g. a beta-lactam or an aminoglycoside. In such cases our knowledge of frequent enzymatic inactivation mechanisms provides a basis not only for the evaluation of an existing drug, but also for the synthesis of new derivatives.
获得性耐药可定义为细胞遗传物质的定性改变,其表型与细胞对一种或几种化疗药物敏感性的可测量降低相关。有两种基本的遗传机制可导致耐药性的出现:突变和从另一个细胞获得额外的遗传物质。这两种耐药形式在临床情况中都起着重要作用:肿瘤细胞中通过突变产生的耐药性也会导致抗微生物化疗中的治疗问题。然而,在细菌中,获得耐药质粒是主要机制,它导致了临床环境中的大多数治疗问题。耐药性出现所涉及的不同遗传机制,至少在细菌中,与两种主要不同的实施耐药性的生化机制相对应。突变导致单细胞成分的改变,如细胞膜或抗菌剂结合所需的细胞受体。这种耐药形式的生化特征是特定化合物无法进入细胞内部,或细胞内结合位点发生修饰,从而失去对化疗药物的亲和力。另一方面,耐药质粒编码使抗生素失活的酶(β-内酰胺酶、氨基糖苷失活酶、氯霉素乙酰转移酶);在某些情况下,它们指导影响细胞通透性的蛋白质合成(四环素)或对抑制剂亲和力较低的同工酶合成(甲氧苄啶)。对抗生素的耐药性可以是诱导性的;在这些情况下,所涉及的调节机制与耐药性本身一样是稳定的遗传特征;以氯霉素、β-内酰胺抗生素和氨基糖苷为例,证明在新药开发早期收集的耐药性数据在评估新化合物的临床潜力方面价值不大。关于耐药性产生的速率、出现的模式(“单步”或“多步”)以及交叉耐药模式的信息,对于新药的特性描述很重要,但在临床环境中后来获得的发现往往使其无效;如果一种新药是已知化合物类别的成员,例如β-内酰胺或氨基糖苷,问题似乎会稍微简单一些。在这种情况下,我们对常见酶促失活机制的了解不仅为评估现有药物提供了基础,也为新衍生物的合成提供了基础。