Thoms L M, Nicholls J I, Brudvik J S, Kydd W L
University of Seattle, Washington.
Int J Prosthodont. 1994 Sep-Oct;7(5):403-9.
Four third-generation dentin bonding products (Scotchbond Multi-Purpose, Optibond, All-Bond 2, and Prisma Universal Bond 3) were tested to evaluate their tensile bond strength to enamel. Test enamel specimens were etched, primed, and polymerized according to each manufacturer's directions. Control specimens were treated identically except the primer application was eliminated. The results demonstrated that the dentin primer significantly increased the tensile bond strength of All-Bond 2, significantly decreased the tensile bond strength of Scotchbond Multi-Purpose and Optibond, and had no significant effect for Prisma Universal Bond 3. A one-way analysis of variance was run between the eight groups tested, and three significant subsets were found (P < .05). The subset with the highest mean tensile bond strengths consisted of Prisma Universal Bond 3 primed and nonprimed, All-Bond 2 primed, and Optibond nonprimed.
对四种第三代牙本质粘结产品(Scotchbond多功能粘结剂、Optibond粘结剂、全粘结剂2和Prisma通用粘结剂3)进行了测试,以评估它们与牙釉质的拉伸粘结强度。根据各制造商的说明对测试牙釉质样本进行酸蚀、涂底漆和聚合处理。对照样本的处理方式相同,只是不涂底漆。结果表明,牙本质底漆显著提高了全粘结剂2的拉伸粘结强度,显著降低了Scotchbond多功能粘结剂和Optibond粘结剂的拉伸粘结强度,而对Prisma通用粘结剂3没有显著影响。对所测试的八组样本进行了单因素方差分析,发现了三个显著子集(P < 0.05)。平均拉伸粘结强度最高的子集包括涂底漆和未涂底漆的Prisma通用粘结剂3、涂底漆的全粘结剂2和未涂底漆的Optibond粘结剂。