Suppr超能文献

患有和未患有合并症的抑郁症门诊患者的临床医生专业和治疗方式。

Clinician specialty and treatment style for depressed outpatients with and without medical comorbidities.

作者信息

Meredith L S, Wells K B, Camp P

机构信息

RAND, Santa Monica, Calif.

出版信息

Arch Fam Med. 1994 Dec;3(12):1065-72. doi: 10.1001/archfami.3.12.1065.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The advent of clinical practice guidelines for the management of depression increases the importance of understanding variation across clinician specialty groups in treatment styles for depression and the role of medical comorbidities.

METHODS

Data are reported by clinicians (N = 470) and patients (N = 2545). Multiple regression was used to compare the treatment styles (counseling and prescribing antidepressants) of family physicians with those of psychiatrists, medical subspecialists, internists, psychologists, and other therapists for depressed patients with different medical comorbidities.

RESULTS

Relative to other primary care specialists, family physicians had the strongest preferences for both counseling and prescribing antidepressants for depressed patients. Family physicians reported preferences for treating with antidepressants that were similar to those of psychiatrists. However, in actual practice, medication use was higher among the patients of psychiatrists than those of family physicians. Mental health care specialists reported the strongest counseling preferences and provided the most counseling in actual practice, compared with general medicine physicians. Internists and subspecialists had similar preferences for prescribing antidepressants, but, compared with internists, subspecialists had lower preferences for counseling. Clinician preferences for counseling were similar for depressed patients with or without medical comorbidities, but preferences for prescribing antidepressants were lowest for patients with depression and myocardial infarction, compared with other patient groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Measures of clinician treatment style for depression are good proxies for counseling but not for prescribing practices. Among general medical physicians, family physicians have the strongest reported preferences in treating depression but, especially in terms of medication therapy, do not always follow those preferences. Preferred treatments of patients with and without medical comorbidities were similar. Findings have implications for improving the quality of treatment of depressed patients.

摘要

背景

抑郁症管理临床实践指南的出现,增加了理解不同临床专科群体在抑郁症治疗方式上的差异以及合并症作用的重要性。

方法

数据由临床医生(N = 470)和患者(N = 2545)报告。采用多元回归比较家庭医生与精神科医生、医学亚专科医生、内科医生、心理学家及其他治疗师对不同合并症抑郁症患者的治疗方式(咨询和开具抗抑郁药)。

结果

相对于其他初级保健专科医生,家庭医生对抑郁症患者进行咨询和开具抗抑郁药的偏好最强。家庭医生报告的使用抗抑郁药治疗的偏好与精神科医生相似。然而,在实际临床中,精神科医生的患者使用药物的比例高于家庭医生的患者。与普通内科医生相比,心理健康护理专家报告的咨询偏好最强,且在实际临床中提供的咨询最多。内科医生和亚专科医生在开具抗抑郁药方面有相似的偏好,但与内科医生相比,亚专科医生的咨询偏好较低。无论有无合并症,临床医生对抑郁症患者咨询的偏好相似,但与其他患者群体相比,抑郁症合并心肌梗死患者开具抗抑郁药的偏好最低。

结论

临床医生对抑郁症治疗方式的衡量是咨询的良好指标,但不是开药实践的良好指标。在普通内科医生中,家庭医生在治疗抑郁症方面报告的偏好最强,但特别是在药物治疗方面,并不总是遵循这些偏好。有合并症和无合并症患者的首选治疗方法相似。研究结果对改善抑郁症患者的治疗质量具有启示意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验