Suppr超能文献

审核药物代谢方案、数据和报告。

Auditing drug metabolism protocols, data, and reports.

作者信息

Lucas G, Walls S

机构信息

Glaxo Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709.

出版信息

Qual Assur. 1994 Jun;3(2):193-7.

PMID:7804636
Abstract

A critical component of the drug discovery process is to assess the safety and metabolic disposition of a drug. This can be accomplished by evaluating drug concentration levels as part of safety assessment studies (toxicokinetics) and identifying the drug's presence in and throughout the body by conducting ADME (adsorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion) studies. From a regulatory perspective, the major difference between these two types of evaluations is that toxicokinetic studies are under the purview of the Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) regulations (21 CFR 58) and ADME studies are not. International debate continues to resolve around the need to consider the applicability of the GLPs to ADME studies. While it is recognized that the current regulatory intent between ADME and toxicokinetic studies differs, this inspecting/auditing approach treats them generally the same. It assures management and external reviewers that data integrity measures are in place for all drug metabolism studies conducted by the facility.

摘要

药物发现过程的一个关键组成部分是评估药物的安全性和代谢情况。这可以通过在安全性评估研究(毒代动力学)中评估药物浓度水平,并通过进行ADME(吸收、分布、代谢和排泄)研究来确定药物在体内及全身的存在情况来实现。从监管角度来看,这两种评估类型的主要区别在于毒代动力学研究属于良好实验室规范(GLP)法规(21 CFR 58)的范畴,而ADME研究则不属于。关于GLP法规对ADME研究适用性的考量,国际上的争论仍在持续。虽然人们认识到目前ADME研究和毒代动力学研究的监管意图有所不同,但这种检查/审核方法对它们的处理大致相同。它向管理层和外部评审人员保证,该机构进行的所有药物代谢研究都有数据完整性措施。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验