• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

批评人士对加拿大医生现行薪酬体系提出质疑,引发听众怀疑。

Audience sceptical as critic challenges current system for paying Canada's MDs.

作者信息

Sullivan P

出版信息

CMAJ. 1995 Jan 1;152(1):93-4.

PMID:7804926
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1337501/
Abstract

A recent CMA-sponsored conference on negotiations brought medical leaders from across Canada to Ottawa in September to hear experts discuss the current health care environment. Among the speakers was Dr. Michael Rachlis, a widely quoted critic of physicians' current role in the health care system. He said physicians and patients currently face major "equity issues," as some patients have a difficult time finding medical help because their serious illnesses are "worth" less to doctors, many of whom prefer to see patients with simple problems that can be dealt with in a few minutes. Several physicians reacted strongly to the criticism.

摘要

最近,加拿大医学协会(CMA)主办了一场关于谈判的会议,9月,来自加拿大各地的医学领军人物齐聚渥太华,聆听专家们探讨当前的医疗环境。演讲者之一是迈克尔·拉赫利斯博士,他是一位被广泛引用的、对医生在医疗系统中当前角色提出批评的人。他说,医生和患者目前面临重大的“公平问题”,因为一些患者很难获得医疗帮助,因为他们的重病对医生来说“价值”较低,许多医生更愿意看那些可以在几分钟内处理好的简单问题的患者。几位医生对这一批评反应强烈。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b0f/1337501/9d14fe410b68/cmaj00061-0094-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b0f/1337501/130c636d3473/cmaj00061-0093-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b0f/1337501/9d14fe410b68/cmaj00061-0094-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b0f/1337501/130c636d3473/cmaj00061-0093-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b0f/1337501/9d14fe410b68/cmaj00061-0094-a.jpg

相似文献

1
Audience sceptical as critic challenges current system for paying Canada's MDs.批评人士对加拿大医生现行薪酬体系提出质疑,引发听众怀疑。
CMAJ. 1995 Jan 1;152(1):93-4.
2
Policy versus practice: comparison of prescribing therapy and durable medical equipment in medical and educational settings.政策与实践:医疗和教育环境中处方治疗与耐用医疗设备的比较
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e612-25. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1063.
3
Universal access in Canada. Questions of equity remain.加拿大的全民医疗服务。公平性问题依然存在。
Health PAC Bull. 1992 Fall;22(3):29-35.
4
Next! Cashing in on our Medicare system.
CPJ. 1989 Nov;122(11):594-6, 629.
5
Staying ahead financially. Reimbursement tips for a changing environment.
Mich Med. 1998 Mar;97(3):24-30.
6
Practice patterns and billing patterns: let's be frank.执业模式与计费模式:咱们坦诚地说。
CMAJ. 1998 Mar 24;158(6):760-1.
7
Saving Medicare. What can we do?拯救医疗保险。我们能做些什么?
Can Fam Physician. 1993 Aug;39:1704-8.
8
Does the way physicians are paid influence the way they practice? The case of Canadian family physicians' work activity.医生的薪酬方式是否会影响他们的行医方式?以加拿大家庭医生的工作活动为例。
Health Policy. 2010 Dec;98(2-3):203-17. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.06.019. Epub 2010 Jul 15.
9
Is it worth it?这值得吗?
Microsurgery. 2003;23(6):537-8. doi: 10.1002/micr.10206.
10
Organization for rural MDs focuses "on problems that separate us from our urban counterparts".农村医生组织关注“使我们与城市同行相区别的问题”。
CMAJ. 1995 Jul 15;153(2):197-200.

引用本文的文献

1
Global physician budgets as common-property resources: some implications for physicians and medical associations.作为公共财产资源的全球医生预算:对医生和医学协会的一些影响。
CMAJ. 1996 Apr 15;154(8):1161-8.