Wik L, Naess P A, Ilebekk A, Steen P A
Department of Education and Research in Acute Medicine, Norwegian Air Ambulance, Droebak.
Resuscitation. 1994 Jul;28(1):55-64. doi: 10.1016/0300-9572(94)90055-8.
The effects of adding active compression-decompression and abdominal binding separately or combined to standard compression CPR was tested in a randomized cross-over design during ventricular fibrillation in eight pigs. The flow and pressure effects of the two techniques appeared to be additive with no interference between the two. Carotid blood flow increased 22% with active compression-decompression, 34% with abdominal binding and 59% with the combination compared to flow with standard compression. Peak antegrade carotid flow occurred in early systole with retrograde flow in early diastole and close to zero in late diastole with no profound alterations induced by active decompression or abdominal binding. Abdominal binding increased the intrathoracic pressure during the compression phase as estimated from the esophageal pressure, while active decompression caused a negative esophageal pressure during the decompression phase. Neither active decompression nor abdominal binding caused any changes in the coronary perfusion pressure, nor in the left ventricular transmural pressure except for a rise in mid-diastolic pressure with active decompression.