Suppr超能文献

囊性纤维化患者中的多凝集性铜绿假单胞菌。一项调查。

Polyagglutinable Pseudomonas aeruginosa from cystic fibrosis patients. A survey.

作者信息

Ojeniyi B

机构信息

Department of Clinical Microbiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

APMIS Suppl. 1994;46:1-44.

PMID:7811529
Abstract

Chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa lung infection is responsible for most of the mortallity and morbility observed in cystic fibrosis patients. During the course of the disease, the bacteria change from being O-serogroup typable (monoagglutinable), non-mucoid, resistant to normal human serum and motile, to become O-serogroup non-typable (polyagglutinable), serum-sensitive and non-motile. In spite of high levels of antibodies produced by the patient, and intensive antibiotic therapy it is not possible to eradiate the polyagglutinable bacteria from the lungs of the patients. The bacteria will reappear and it is not fully understood if it is the same strain which reappears, or it is a super-infection with a new strain which takes place. A reliable and stable typing method is needed to clarify this question. In the present study, the conventional typing methods, such as serotyping, phage typing and pyocin typing were compared with the newer DNA typing methods, such as, restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) in combination with pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and typing with a specific DNA probe. Typability, reproducibility and discriminatory power using the different typing methods were investigated. The conventional typing methods have proved to be adequate when typing P. aeruginosa isolates from non cystic fibrosis sources, but because the majority of cystic fibrosis P. aeruginosa isolates are polyagglutinable or non typable, serotyping is not useful. Phage typing also lacks discriminatory power as it lumps up to 40% of the isolates in the same phage group. Pyocin typing has the disadvantage of low reproducibility. Most of the conventional typing methods are based on receptors on the bacterial surface, which on exposure to the environmental conditions in the lung, are likely to provoke phenotypic changes of the bacteria. The obvious advantage of the newer DNA typing methods is that these methods are based on internal properties of the bacteria, as part of the bacterial genome is investigated. The present study has revealed that for the time being, restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) in combination with phage typing is the best method of typing P. aeruginosa isolates from cystic fibrosis patients for epidemiological purposes.

摘要

慢性铜绿假单胞菌肺部感染是囊性纤维化患者出现大多数死亡和发病情况的原因。在疾病过程中,细菌从可进行O血清群分型(单凝集)、非黏液型、对正常人血清有抗性且具运动性,转变为不可进行O血清群分型(多凝集)、血清敏感且无运动性。尽管患者产生了高水平抗体,且进行了强化抗生素治疗,但仍无法从患者肺部清除多凝集性细菌。这些细菌会再次出现,目前尚不完全清楚再次出现的是否为同一菌株,还是发生了新菌株的超级感染。需要一种可靠且稳定的分型方法来阐明这个问题。在本研究中,将传统分型方法,如血清分型、噬菌体分型和绿脓菌素分型,与更新的DNA分型方法,如限制性片段长度多态性(RFLP)结合脉冲场凝胶电泳(PFGE)以及使用特异性DNA探针进行分型,进行了比较。研究了使用不同分型方法时的分型能力、可重复性和鉴别力。已证明传统分型方法在对来自非囊性纤维化来源的铜绿假单胞菌分离株进行分型时是足够的,但由于大多数囊性纤维化铜绿假单胞菌分离株是多凝集性或不可分型的,血清分型并无用处。噬菌体分型也缺乏鉴别力,因为它将多达40%的分离株归为同一噬菌体组。绿脓菌素分型具有可重复性低的缺点。大多数传统分型方法基于细菌表面的受体,而这些受体在暴露于肺部的环境条件时,可能会引发细菌的表型变化。更新的DNA分型方法的明显优势在于,这些方法基于细菌的内在特性,因为研究的是细菌基因组的一部分。本研究表明,目前,限制性片段长度多态性(RFLP)和脉冲场凝胶电泳(PFGE)结合噬菌体分型是用于流行病学目的对囊性纤维化患者的铜绿假单胞菌分离株进行分型的最佳方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验