Turner R C, Hattersley A T, Shaw J T, Levy J C
Diabetes Research Laboratories, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford, U.K.
Diabetes. 1995 Jan;44(1):1-10. doi: 10.2337/diab.44.1.1.
Type II diabetes remains a genetic nightmare. The major problem is identifying suitable pedigrees, sib-pairs, and populations for study. Segregation analysis data suggest that type II diabetes is likely to be polygenic, although one or more major genes could also be involved. This and the high prevalence of diabetes affect the strategies for searching for genetic mutations. Linkage analysis in classical type II diabetes pedigrees is unlikely to be successful. In addition, affected sib-pair analysis is limited because both parents are often affected, leading to bilineal inheritance. Sib-pairs with both parents alive are unusual, so identity by descent analysis is rarely feasible. Strategies to reduce bilineal inheritance by identifying sib-pairs with one known nondiabetic parent or with the second sibling having mild subclinical diabetes may be worthwhile. Identification of individuals or pedigrees with an unusual phenotype that suggests a single gene disorder, such as maturity-onset diabetes of the young, will continue to be important, for this allows linkage analysis with markers near candidate genes and exclusion mapping of chromosomal regions using highly polymorphic markers. Population association studies with candidate genes can detect mutations that have a minor role in the majority proportion of diabetic subjects, but large numbers are required and great care must be taken to exclude ethnic group differences between the diabetic and normoglycemic populations. The study of small inbred communities might be helpful because they may have fewer diabetogenic genes than outbred populations, and this would increase the power of sib-pair and population association studies. Direct screening for mutations in candidate genes (with single-strand conformation polymorphism or heteroduplex screening or with direct sequencing) in patients with the appropriate pathophysiological abnormality can be a successful strategy. The identification of well-defined diabetic pedigrees, sib-pairs, and suitable matched diabetic and nondiabetic populations will be key to the discovery of the genes for diabetes.
2型糖尿病仍然是遗传学上的一大难题。主要问题在于确定适合研究的家系、同胞对和人群。分离分析数据表明,2型糖尿病可能是多基因的,不过也可能涉及一个或多个主基因。糖尿病的高发病率及其多基因特性影响了寻找基因突变的策略。在经典的2型糖尿病家系中进行连锁分析不太可能成功。此外,受累同胞对分析也受到限制,因为父母双方往往都患病,导致双亲遗传。父母均健在的同胞对并不常见,因此通过血缘关系进行身份鉴定分析很少可行。通过识别一方已知为非糖尿病患者的同胞对或另一方患有轻度亚临床糖尿病的同胞对来减少双亲遗传的策略可能是值得的。识别具有异常表型(提示单基因疾病)的个体或家系,如青年发病的成年型糖尿病,仍然很重要,因为这有助于使用候选基因附近的标记进行连锁分析,并使用高度多态性标记对染色体区域进行排除性定位。对候选基因进行人群关联研究可以检测出在大多数糖尿病患者中起次要作用的突变,但需要大量样本,并且必须格外小心以排除糖尿病患者和血糖正常人群之间的种族差异。对小型近亲社区进行研究可能会有所帮助,因为与非近亲人群相比,他们可能具有较少的致糖尿病基因,这将提高同胞对和人群关联研究的效力。对具有适当病理生理异常的患者直接筛选候选基因中的突变(采用单链构象多态性或异源双链筛选或直接测序)可能是一种成功的策略。识别明确的糖尿病家系、同胞对以及合适的匹配糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者人群,将是发现糖尿病相关基因的关键。