Avery P, Banning A, Lawson T, McGurk L, Buchalter M
Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK.
Int J Cardiol. 1994 Sep;46(2):129-33. doi: 10.1016/0167-5273(94)90033-7.
We evaluated the benefits of physiological pacing in the elderly by recruiting 13 subjects > 75 years of age, already fitted with a physiological pacing system. All had been paced for complete or Mobitz II heart block. Double blind cross over study was performed comparing exercise capacity, measuring distance walked on a 6-min walking test and time taken to climb two flights of stairs; and symptoms, evaluated by an activity of daily living questionnaire, in atrioventricular synchronous and ventricular pacing. Mean distance walked was significantly higher in atrioventricular synchronous than in ventricular pacing (360 +/- 65 m vs. 327 +/- 69 m; P < 0.01). No significant difference was found in the ability to climb stairs but there was a marked improvement in the symptomatic questionnaire score, 19 +/- 5 in physiological pacing increasing to 28 +/- 10 with ventricular. Physiological pacing in the elderly produces an increase in exercise tolerance and improves symptoms; therefore, age alone should not be a contraindication to a physiological system.
我们招募了13名年龄超过75岁且已安装生理性起搏系统的受试者,评估生理性起搏对老年人的益处。所有受试者均因完全性或莫氏Ⅱ型心脏传导阻滞而接受起搏治疗。进行了双盲交叉研究,比较了运动能力(通过6分钟步行试验测量行走距离以及爬两层楼梯所需时间)和症状(通过日常生活活动问卷评估)在房室同步起搏和心室起搏时的情况。房室同步起搏时的平均行走距离显著高于心室起搏(360±65米对327±69米;P<0.01)。爬楼梯能力方面未发现显著差异,但症状问卷评分有明显改善,生理性起搏时为19±5,心室起搏时增至28±10。老年人的生理性起搏可提高运动耐量并改善症状;因此,仅年龄不应成为生理性起搏系统的禁忌证。