• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Health care reform: a study in moral malfeasance.

作者信息

Engelhardt H T

机构信息

Center for Ethics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030.

出版信息

J Med Philos. 1994 Oct;19(5):501-16. doi: 10.1093/jmp/19.5.501.

DOI:10.1093/jmp/19.5.501
PMID:7815005
Abstract

Instead of benefitting from open meetings and public discussions, the Clintons drafted their health care plan in private and asked that it be accepted in haste. They advance an ideology that claims we can receive the best care for all without any increase in cost or rationing, and then they use "ethicists" to justify this ideology through a supposedly common morality. However, there is no such common morality. In the context of American pluralism, one must look to the actual consent of the governed and recognize the limits on state authority. The result will be a two tiered system of health care, with a basic tier focusing on cost-effective care for the poor that eliminates suffering rather than equalizing inputs, and a space for collateral private insurance.

摘要

相似文献

1
Health care reform: a study in moral malfeasance.
J Med Philos. 1994 Oct;19(5):501-16. doi: 10.1093/jmp/19.5.501.
2
Ethicists and health care reform: an indecent proposal?伦理学家与医疗保健改革:一个不得体的提议?
J Med Philos. 1994 Oct;19(5):419-24. doi: 10.1093/jmp/19.5.419.
3
The articulation of values and principles involved in health care reform.医疗保健改革中所涉及的价值观和原则的阐述。
J Med Philos. 1994 Oct;19(5):425-33. doi: 10.1093/jmp/19.5.425.
4
Government and bureaucratic bioethics: addressing moral issues in the service of ideology.政府与官僚生物伦理学:为意识形态服务处理道德问题。
J Med Philos. 1996 Apr;21(2):113-9. doi: 10.1093/jmp/21.2.113.
5
Should we create a health care system in the United States?我们应该在美国创建一个医疗保健系统吗?
J Med Philos. 1994 Oct;19(5):483-90. doi: 10.1093/jmp/19.5.483.
6
Healthcare as a commons.作为公共资源的医疗保健。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1995 Spring;4(2):207-16. doi: 10.1017/s0963180100005909.
7
Allocating health care: cost-utility analysis, informed democratic decision making, or the veil of ignorance?医疗保健资源分配:成本效用分析、明智的民主决策还是无知之幕?
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1996 Spring;21(1):69-98. doi: 10.1215/03616878-21-1-69.
8
Ethics, politics, and health care reform.
J Med Philos. 1994 Oct;19(5):397-405. doi: 10.1093/jmp/19.5.397.
9
The Catholic church and U.S. health care reform.天主教会与美国医疗保健改革。
Med Anthropol Q. 1996 Mar;10(1):3-19. doi: 10.1525/maq.1996.10.1.02a00010.
10
Principles for national health care reform.
Hastings Cent Rep. 1994 May-Jun;24(3):8-9.

引用本文的文献

1
What Help is a Steward? Stewardship, Political Theory, and Public Health Law and Ethics.管家能提供什么帮助?管理工作、政治理论与公共卫生法律及伦理。
North Irel Leg Q. 2011 Dec 20;62(4):599-616.