Depelchin S, Dehennin J P, Bottaro A, Carbonara A, Vaerman J P, Sibille Y
Experimental Medicine Unit, Catholic University of Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Int J Clin Lab Res. 1994;24(3):154-61. doi: 10.1007/BF02592446.
We describe specific, sensitive and reproducible immunoradiometric assays to measure total IgA and IgA subclass levels in biological fluids, which take into account the problem that polymeric forms are differently recognized in immunoassays. Sera from subjects totally deficient in one of the IgA subclasses allowed us to ensure the specificity of the subclass assays and to define the proportions of IgA1 (84%) and IgA2 (16%) in the normal pooled serum (from 30 blood donors) used as standard. With purified milk 11-S secretory IgA1 and 11-S secretory IgA2, we determined a correction factor for the corresponding polymeric forms using, respectively, monomeric IgA1 and monomeric IgA2 from pooled serum as standards. With the monoclonal antibodies used, purified 11-S secretory IgA1 was similarly recognized by both the total IgA assay and the IgA1 assay; both total IgA and IgA1 concentrations were underestimated compared with monomeric IgA or monomeric IgA1. In contrast, 11-S secretory IgA2 was better recognized by the IgA2 assay than by the total IgA assay and the values were thus overestimates. Considering this problem of recognition, we fractionated saliva and lung secretions by sucrose density gradient ultracentrifugation before measuring their IgA1 and IgA2 levels.
我们描述了用于测量生物体液中总IgA和IgA亚类水平的特异性、灵敏且可重复的免疫放射分析方法,该方法考虑到了免疫分析中聚合物形式被不同识别的问题。来自完全缺乏一种IgA亚类的受试者的血清使我们能够确保亚类分析的特异性,并确定用作标准的正常混合血清(来自30名献血者)中IgA1(84%)和IgA2(16%)的比例。使用纯化的牛奶11-S分泌型IgA1和11-S分泌型IgA2,我们分别以混合血清中的单体IgA1和单体IgA2作为标准,确定了相应聚合物形式的校正因子。使用所使用的单克隆抗体时,纯化的11-S分泌型IgA1在总IgA分析和IgA1分析中均被类似地识别;与单体IgA或单体IgA1相比,总IgA和IgA1浓度均被低估。相反,11-S分泌型IgA2在IgA2分析中比在总IgA分析中被更好地识别,因此其值被高估。考虑到这种识别问题,我们在测量唾液和肺分泌物的IgA1和IgA2水平之前,通过蔗糖密度梯度超速离心对其进行了分级分离。