Delacroix D L, Van Snick J, Vaerman J P, Conley M E, Mascart-Lemone F, Bernier G M
Mol Immunol. 1986 Apr;23(4):367-75. doi: 10.1016/0161-5890(86)90134-3.
We have analysed and compared the fine specificity and behavior in various immunoassays of 10 mouse monoclonal antibodies, from three independent laboratories, directed against IgA1, IgA2 or non-IgA2m(2). The following observations were made. (1) Although all of the monoclonal antibodies were specific for a particular IgA subclass or isoallotype in a radioimmunoassay, three of them were not specific when tested in indirect immunofluorescence on plasma cells derived from pokeweed-activated peripheral blood lymphocytes. In this highly sensitive system, contrary to direct immunofluorescence previously performed using formalin-fixed lymphoid tissue, the anti-IgA1 69.114 reacted with some of the IgA2 plasma cells, the anti-IgA2 DLDB7 reacted with some of the IgA1 plasma cells and the anti-IgA2 16.512 dimly reacted with all IgM plasma cells. (2) Among the eight anti-IgA subclass antibodies, seven were directed against the CH2 domain of IgA whereas the anti-IgA1 1-155-1 recognised an epitope destroyed by Streptococcus sanguis IgA1 protease and localised in the hinge region of IgA1. The two anti-isoallotype antibodies were directed against epitope(s) probably localised in the 65 C-terminal amino acid residues of the alpha-CH3 domain. All of the 10 antibodies were able to react with endogeneously produced surface IgA on B-cells. (3) Using monoclonal anti-IgA subclass antibodies in radioimmunoassay may be hazardous in the absence of knowledge of their affinity constants and of careful control experiments: some of the antibodies were not sensitive in radioimmunoassays designed to measure the serum titer of specific IgA1 and IgA2 antibodies. Moreover, major differences were observed between the different monoclonal reagents with respect to the influence of the size of IgA on a solid-phase sandwich radioimmunoassay. While three of the anti-IgA1 underestimated dimeric IgA relative to monomeric IgA, the fourth anti-IgA1 and all the anti-IgA2 overestimated dimeric IgA relative to monomeric IgA, by a factor sometimes close to 7.
我们分析并比较了来自三个独立实验室的10种针对IgA1、IgA2或非IgA2m(2)的小鼠单克隆抗体在各种免疫测定中的精细特异性和表现。得出了以下观察结果。(1) 尽管所有单克隆抗体在放射免疫测定中对特定的IgA亚类或同种异型特异性,但其中三种在对商陆激活的外周血淋巴细胞来源的浆细胞进行间接免疫荧光检测时并不具有特异性。在这个高灵敏度系统中,与先前使用福尔马林固定的淋巴组织进行的直接免疫荧光检测相反,抗IgA1 69.114与一些IgA2浆细胞发生反应,抗IgA2 DLDB7与一些IgA1浆细胞发生反应,抗IgA2 16.512与所有IgM浆细胞发生微弱反应。(2) 在8种抗IgA亚类抗体中,7种针对IgA的CH2结构域,而抗IgA1 1-155-1识别一个被血链球菌IgA1蛋白酶破坏且位于IgA1铰链区的表位。两种抗同种异型抗体针对可能位于α-CH3结构域65个C末端氨基酸残基中的表位。所有10种抗体都能够与B细胞上内源性产生的表面IgA发生反应。(3) 在缺乏对其亲和常数的了解和仔细对照实验的情况下,在放射免疫测定中使用单克隆抗IgA亚类抗体可能存在风险:一些抗体在旨在测量特异性IgA1和IgA2抗体血清滴度的放射免疫测定中不敏感。此外,在固相夹心放射免疫测定中,不同单克隆试剂在IgA大小影响方面存在重大差异。虽然三种抗IgA1相对于单体IgA低估了二聚体IgA,但第四种抗IgA1和所有抗IgA2相对于单体IgA高估了二聚体IgA,有时高估倍数接近7。