• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新生儿一日一次使用阿米卡星:肾毒性和耳毒性评估

Once-a-day administration of amikacin in neonates: assessment of nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity.

作者信息

Langhendries J P, Battisti O, Bertrand J M, François A, Darimont J, Ibrahim S, Tulkens P M, Bernard A, Buchet J P, Scalais E

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics, Children's Hospital, St-Joseph-Espérance-Rocourt, Clinique St-Vincent, Belgium.

出版信息

Dev Pharmacol Ther. 1993;20(3-4):220-30. doi: 10.1159/000457566.

DOI:10.1159/000457566
PMID:7828457
Abstract

Neonates, especially preterms, are known to have low glomerular filtration rates (GFR). This may result in elevated trough concentrations during multiple administration of aminoglycosides (AGs), potentially leading to nephro- and ototoxic reactions. The once-daily administration (q.d.) of AGs has been shown to be equally or better tolerated in adults and children than the conventional schedules (twice daily, b.i.d.; thrice daily, t.i.d.), while offering potential pharmacodynamic and nursing advantages. No data, however, are available for neonates. As a consequence, this pilot study was conducted in order to assess the tolerance of the once-a-day administration of amikacin in comparison with the twice daily dose regimen, in relation to the pharmacokinetics of the drug under these two schedules. 22 Male neonates (gestational age > or = 34 weeks; postnatal age < or = 2 days) were randomized to receive amikacin (AK) (15 mg/kg/day) q.d. (n = 10) or b.i.d. (n = 12) together with ampicillin (50 mg/kg/12 h). AK plasma levels were measured at days 1, 3, 5 and 7 of treatment just before the next dose (trough level) and 1 h after completion of infusion (peak level) and after 3 and 6 h only at day 1. Due to the small size of the samples, no difference in efficacy could be assessed and was not the aim per se. Glomerular dysfunction was assessed by creatinine clearance, and tubular injuries by the urinary excretion of proteins (retinol binding protein, beta 2-microglobulin, clara cell protein (P1) and microalbumin), enzymes (N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase, alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminopeptidase, and gamma-glutamyltransferase), and total phospholipids (TPL) in urine. Ototoxicity was assessed by brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs) at days 0, 3 and 9 of therapy. Eight healthy neonates served as controls. All patients showed a normal and similar increase of GFR during the first postnatal days. Proteinuria did not increase, but enzymuria and TPL increased significantly during the treatment in both AK groups without significant difference between groups. BAEPs at day 9 were not significantly different between treated and untreated patients. We conclude from this pilot study that, in the absence of more toxicity, the q.d. administration of AK in neonates of > or = 34 weeks of gestational age may be recommended over its bid schedule in view of its potential advantages.

摘要

众所周知,新生儿尤其是早产儿的肾小球滤过率(GFR)较低。这可能导致在多次使用氨基糖苷类药物(AGs)时血药谷浓度升高,进而可能引发肾毒性和耳毒性反应。在成人和儿童中,AGs每日一次给药已被证明比传统给药方案(每日两次,bid;每日三次,tid)耐受性相同或更好,同时还具有潜在的药效学和护理优势。然而,尚无关于新生儿的相关数据。因此,开展了这项前瞻性研究,以评估与每日两次给药方案相比,每日一次给予阿米卡星的耐受性,并研究这两种给药方案下药物的药代动力学。将22名男性新生儿(胎龄≥34周;出生后年龄≤2天)随机分为两组,一组每日一次(qd)接受阿米卡星(AK)(15mg/kg/天)治疗(n = 10),另一组每日两次(bid)接受治疗(n = 12),两组均联合氨苄西林(50mg/kg/12h)治疗。在治疗的第1、3、5和7天,在下一次给药前(谷浓度)、输液结束后1小时(峰浓度)以及仅在第1天的3和6小时测量AK血浆水平。由于样本量较小,无法评估疗效差异,且疗效本身也不是本研究的目的。通过肌酐清除率评估肾小球功能障碍,通过尿液中蛋白质(视黄醇结合蛋白、β2-微球蛋白、克拉拉细胞蛋白(P1)和微量白蛋白)、酶(N-乙酰-β-D-氨基葡萄糖苷酶、碱性磷酸酶、丙氨酸氨基肽酶和γ-谷氨酰转移酶)以及总磷脂(TPL)的排泄评估肾小管损伤。在治疗的第0、3和9天,通过脑干听觉诱发电位(BAEP)评估耳毒性。选取8名健康新生儿作为对照。所有患者在出生后的头几天GFR均出现正常且相似的升高。蛋白尿未增加,但在两个AK治疗组中,治疗期间酶尿和TPL均显著增加,两组间无显著差异。治疗组和未治疗组患者在第9天的BAEP无显著差异。我们从这项前瞻性研究得出结论,鉴于每日一次给予AK具有潜在优势,在无更多毒性的情况下,对于胎龄≥34周的新生儿,推荐每日一次给药方案而非每日两次给药方案。

相似文献

1
Once-a-day administration of amikacin in neonates: assessment of nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity.新生儿一日一次使用阿米卡星:肾毒性和耳毒性评估
Dev Pharmacol Ther. 1993;20(3-4):220-30. doi: 10.1159/000457566.
2
Urinary phospholipids excretion in neonates treated with amikacin.
Int J Clin Pharmacol Res. 1994;14(5-6):149-56.
3
The efficacy and toxicity of two dosing-regimens of amikacin in neonates with sepsis.两种不同剂量方案的阿米卡星在新生儿败血症中的疗效和毒性。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2011 Feb;36(1):45-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2009.01152.x.
4
Adaptation in neonatology of the once-daily concept of aminoglycoside administration: evaluation of a dosing chart for amikacin in an intensive care unit.新生儿科对氨基糖苷类药物每日一次给药理念的适应性:重症监护病房中阿米卡星给药图表的评估
Biol Neonate. 1998 Nov;74(5):351-62. doi: 10.1159/000014053.
5
Evaluation of the renal and auditory function of neonates treated with amikacin.
Dev Pharmacol Ther. 1982;5(1-2):33-46.
6
Extended-interval aminoglycoside administration for children: a meta-analysis.儿童延长给药间隔氨基糖苷类药物治疗:一项荟萃分析。
Pediatrics. 2004 Jul;114(1):e111-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.114.1.e111.
7
Serum cystatin C level for better assessment of glomerular filtration rate in cystic fibrosis patients treated by amikacin.血清胱抑素C水平用于更好地评估接受阿米卡星治疗的囊性纤维化患者的肾小球滤过率。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2008 Aug;33(4):409-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2008.00932.x.
8
Safety, pharmacokinetics and efficacy of once-a-day netilmicin and amikacin versus their conventional schedules in patients suffering from pelvic inflammatory disease.每日一次使用奈替米星和阿米卡星与传统给药方案相比,在盆腔炎患者中的安全性、药代动力学及疗效
Ren Fail. 1990;12(3):199-203. doi: 10.3109/08860229009065564.
9
One dose per day compared to multiple doses per day of gentamicin for treatment of suspected or proven sepsis in neonates.与每日多次剂量的庆大霉素相比,每日一剂治疗新生儿疑似或确诊败血症。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jan 25(1):CD005091. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005091.pub2.
10
Gentamicin-induced ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity vary with circadian time of treatment and entail separate mechanisms.庆大霉素诱导的耳毒性和肾毒性随治疗的昼夜时间而变化,且涉及不同的机制。
Chronobiol Int. 2015;32(9):1223-32. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2015.1082483. Epub 2015 Oct 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Potential Antibiotics for the Treatment of Neonatal Sepsis Caused by Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria.用于治疗多重耐药菌引起的新生儿败血症的潜在抗生素
Paediatr Drugs. 2021 Sep;23(5):465-484. doi: 10.1007/s40272-021-00465-z. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
2
Dose-Related Adverse Drug Events in Neonates: Recognition and Assessment.新生儿与剂量相关的药物不良事件:识别与评估
J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Jun;61 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S152-S160. doi: 10.1002/jcph.1827.
3
Comparison of Amikacin Pharmacokinetics in Neonates With and Without Congenital Heart Disease.
患有和未患有先天性心脏病的新生儿中阿米卡星药代动力学的比较。
J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2021;26(4):372-378. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-26.4.372. Epub 2021 May 19.
4
Prevalence of Hearing Impairment Among High-Risk Newborns in Ibadan, Nigeria.尼日利亚伊巴丹高危新生儿听力障碍患病率
Front Pediatr. 2018 Jul 16;6:194. doi: 10.3389/fped.2018.00194. eCollection 2018.
5
Optimizing Amikacin Dosage in Pediatrics Based on Population Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modeling.基于群体药代动力学/药效学模型优化儿科中阿米卡星的剂量。
Paediatr Drugs. 2018 Jun;20(3):265-272. doi: 10.1007/s40272-018-0288-y.
6
Comparison of Amikacin Pharmacokinetics in Neonates Following Implementation of a New Dosage Protocol.新剂量方案实施后新生儿阿米卡星药代动力学的比较
J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Jan-Feb;22(1):33-40. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-22.1.33.
7
Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Penicillins, Cephalosporins and Aminoglycosides in the Neonate: A Review.新生儿期青霉素类、头孢菌素类和氨基糖苷类药物的临床药代动力学:综述
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2010 Aug 12;3(8):2568-2591. doi: 10.3390/ph3082568.
8
Individualised dosing of amikacin in neonates: a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis.新生儿阿米卡星个体化给药:药代动力学/药效学分析
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2009 Jul;65(7):705-13. doi: 10.1007/s00228-009-0637-4. Epub 2009 Mar 21.
9
Determination of Clara cell protein urinary elimination as a marker of tubular dysfunction.
Pediatr Nephrol. 2009 Apr;24(4):747-52. doi: 10.1007/s00467-008-1078-5. Epub 2009 Jan 17.
10
Clinical pharmacokinetics of aminoglycosides in the neonate: a review.新生儿氨基糖苷类药物的临床药代动力学:综述
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2009 Apr;65(4):419-27. doi: 10.1007/s00228-008-0599-y. Epub 2008 Dec 23.