Artru F, Chacornac R, Deleuze R
Eur Neurol. 1976;14(4):310-8. doi: 10.1159/000114753.
60 patients were included in a prospective study to evaluate the effectiveness of hyperbaric oxygenation (OHP) as a treatment of head injury coma. They were assigned to nine subgroups according to age, level of consciousness and eventual neurosurgical procedure, and then selected randomly for OHP or standard therapy. OHP was administered in one or several series of daily exposure at 2.5 ATA. However, the OHP therapy protocol was to be interrupted in 11 cases developing pulmonary, hyperoxic, or infectious complications. Overall mortality and mean duration of coma in survivors were not different in both groups, indicating that OHP was either ineffective or too intermittently applicated. Analysis of results in subgroups revealed that, in one subgroup (18 patients), the rate of recovered consciousness at 1 month was significantly higher when OHP was used. These patients were under 30 and had a brain stem contusion without supratentorial mass lesion. The view is defended that, besides its toxic action on the normal nervous tissue, OHP can counteract edema and ischemia in the zones of brain injuries.
60名患者被纳入一项前瞻性研究,以评估高压氧治疗(OHP)对颅脑损伤昏迷的疗效。根据年龄、意识水平和最终的神经外科手术情况,他们被分为9个亚组,然后随机选择接受OHP治疗或标准治疗。OHP以2.5ATA的压力进行每日一次或多次系列治疗。然而,在11例出现肺部、高氧或感染并发症的患者中,OHP治疗方案被中断。两组患者的总体死亡率和幸存者的平均昏迷持续时间没有差异,这表明OHP要么无效,要么应用过于间断。亚组结果分析显示,在一个亚组(18名患者)中,使用OHP时1个月时意识恢复率显著更高。这些患者年龄在30岁以下,有脑干挫伤且无幕上肿块病变。有人认为,除了对正常神经组织的毒性作用外,OHP还可以抵消脑损伤区域的水肿和缺血。