Ridge D T, Plummer D C, Minichiello V
Sexual Health Research Group, School of Behavioural Health Sciences, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.
AIDS Care. 1994;6(4):371-8. doi: 10.1080/09540129408258651.
HIV research often depicts 'adolescents' and 'youth' as having 'unique' qualities which predispose them to sexual risk. Yet, the evidence points to unsafe sexual behaviour as not being socially uniform. At a time when the idea of 'risk groups' for HIV is being subjected to increasing public scrutiny, researchers also need to question assumptions about youth 'risk'. This study examines whether young gay men are at greater risk for unsafe sexual behaviour than older gay men. A questionnaire was administered to 284 predominately gay identified men in Melbourne, Australia, recruited from gay groups, health clinics, gay pubs and nightclubs, sex on premises venues, and the social networks of these men. The results show that, while there was no difference in the level of recent unprotected anal intercourse between age groups, young men (under 25 years) from gay commercial venues or who did not belong to a gay organization(s) had a significantly higher level of recent unprotected anal sex than other young gay men. These results suggest that sexual safety may be more appropriately explained as a social process, rather than a youthful characteristic, and that researchers should include cohort effects into their analyses.
艾滋病病毒研究常常将“青少年”和“青年”描述为具有使其易陷入性风险的“独特”特质。然而,证据表明不安全的性行为在社会层面并非整齐划一。在艾滋病病毒“风险群体”这一概念正受到越来越多公众审视之际,研究人员也需要质疑关于青年“风险”的假设。本研究调查了年轻男同性恋者是否比年长男同性恋者面临更高的不安全性行为风险。对来自澳大利亚墨尔本的284名主要自我认定为同性恋的男性进行了问卷调查,这些男性是从同性恋群体、健康诊所、同性恋酒吧和夜店、有性交易场所,以及这些男性的社交网络中招募而来的。结果显示,虽然不同年龄组之间近期无保护肛交的水平没有差异,但来自同性恋商业场所或不属于任何同性恋组织的年轻男性(25岁以下)近期无保护肛交的水平显著高于其他年轻男同性恋者。这些结果表明,性安全或许更适合被解释为一个社会过程,而非一种年轻的特征,并且研究人员应在分析中纳入群组效应。