Zhuo J, Yang H, Wang S
Guangxi Autonomous Regional Hygiene and Epidemic Prevention Station, Nanning.
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 1994 Aug;15(4):203-5.
Comparison of the data provided by the passive epidemic reporting system (PERS) with those of epidemicologic investigation during the outbreak of measles in a rural area, Rongshui County, from November 26, 1992 to May 10, 1993 indicated that the PERS delayed the report one month during the outbreak, failed to describe the time, place and age distributions correctly. The main drawbacks of the PERS were tediousness and delay. The reformed active surveillance system with diagnostic recipe made the reporting precedures much simpler and well acceptable by the physicians.
对1992年11月26日至1993年5月10日融水县某农村地区麻疹暴发期间被动疫情报告系统（PERS）提供的数据与流行病学调查数据进行比较，结果表明，PERS在疫情暴发期间延迟报告1个月，未能正确描述时间、地点和年龄分布。PERS的主要缺点是繁琐和延迟。改革后的带有诊断处方的主动监测系统使报告程序更加简单，医生更容易接受。
