Suppr超能文献

不同机械通气模式下的近端气道和气管内压力:一项动物模型研究。

Proximal and tracheal airway pressures during different modes of mechanical ventilation: an animal model study.

作者信息

Zobel G, Dacar D, Rödl S

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of Graz, Austria.

出版信息

Pediatr Pulmonol. 1994 Oct;18(4):239-43. doi: 10.1002/ppul.1950180408.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the differences between the mean proximal and tracheal airway pressures during 3 different modes of mechanical ventilation (MV) in an animal model of acute cardiac failure (CF) and respiratory failure (RF).

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, cross-over design.

SETTING

University research laboratory.

SUBJECTS

Twelve young pigs weighing 10-16 kg.

INTERVENTIONS

The experimental protocol consisted of 3 stable 30 min conditions: when ventricular and pulmonary function was normal (control), after the induction of acute cardiac failure by a beta-blocking agent and after respiratory failure induced by repeated lung lavages. Modes of MV included controlled mechanical ventilation (CMV), high-frequency oscillation (HFO), and high-frequency jet ventilation (HFJV).

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

The tracheal mean airway pressure (P(aw)) was measured at the distal port of the Hi-lo jet tube using an air-filled pressure transducer. The mean transpulmonary P(aw) increased significantly from 0.41 +/- 0.14 kPa during the control period to 1.15 +/- 0.17 kPa (P < 0.0001) during the RF period. In all study periods both the proximal and tracheal P(aw) were lowest during HFJV. There was no difference between the proximal and tracheal P(aw) during CMV and HFJV throughout the protocol. In the cardiac and respiratory failure periods the proximal P(aw) (CF, 1.45 +/- 0.08 kPa; RF, 3.13 +/- 0.27 kPa) was significantly higher than the tracheal P(aw) (CF, 1.04 +/- 0.09 kPa, P < 0.01; RF, 2.18 +/- 0.3 kPa, P < 0.01) with HFO. When ventilated by HFO, the mean external oscillatory amplitude was 4.33 +/- 0.14 kPa and the intratracheal oscillatory amplitude was only 0.49 +/- 0.06 kPa (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

HFJV provides adequate respiratory support at lower P(aw) than CMV and HFO. Proximal P(aw) closely reflects tracheal P(aw) during CMV and HFJV. However, with HFO great pressure differences between the proximal and tracheal airways are evident. Therefore, additional intratracheal airway pressure monitoring seems to be very useful for optimizing ventilator settings during HFO.

摘要

目的

在急性心力衰竭(CF)和呼吸衰竭(RF)动物模型中,确定三种不同机械通气(MV)模式下近端气道平均压与气管气道平均压之间的差异。

设计

前瞻性、随机、交叉设计。

地点

大学研究实验室。

对象

12头体重10 - 16千克的幼猪。

干预措施

实验方案包括3个持续30分钟的稳定状态:心室和肺功能正常时(对照)、使用β受体阻滞剂诱发急性心力衰竭后以及反复肺灌洗诱发呼吸衰竭后。MV模式包括控制机械通气(CMV)、高频振荡通气(HFO)和高频喷射通气(HFJV)。

测量与结果

使用充气压力传感器在Hi - lo喷射管远端端口测量气管平均气道压(P(aw))。平均跨肺P(aw)在对照期为0.41±0.14千帕,在RF期显著升高至1.15±0.17千帕(P < 0.0001)。在所有研究阶段,HFJV期间近端和气管P(aw)均最低。在整个实验过程中,CMV和HFJV期间近端和气管P(aw)无差异。在心力衰竭和呼吸衰竭期,HFO时近端P(aw)(CF期,1.45±0.08千帕;RF期,3.13±0.27千帕)显著高于气管P(aw)(CF期,1.04±0.09千帕,P < 0.01;RF期,2.18±0.3千帕,P < 0.01)。当采用HFO通气时,平均外部振荡幅度为4.33±0.14千帕,气管内振荡幅度仅为0.49±0.06千帕(P < 0.0001)。

结论

与CMV和HFO相比,HFJV在较低的P(aw)下提供足够的呼吸支持。CMV和HFJV期间近端P(aw)能密切反映气管P(aw)。然而,采用HFO时,近端气道与气管气道之间存在明显的压力差。因此,额外的气管内气道压力监测对于优化HFO期间的呼吸机设置似乎非常有用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验