• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神病患者刑事定罪中的种族差异。

Racial differences in the criminalization of the mentally ill.

作者信息

Grekin P M, Jemelka R, Trupin E W

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle 98195.

出版信息

Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1994;22(3):411-20.

PMID:7841513
Abstract

"Criminalization," the hypothesis that mentally ill persons are diverted to the criminal justice system, has been difficult to confirm. The few relevant studies have examined aspects of the mental health or the criminal justice systems, but not both. This study compares state hospital admissions with the admission of mentally ill persons to state prisons. There was considerable variation between counties. Counties sent more mentally ill members of their largest minority group to prison than expected. These results suggest that jurisdictions differ in their use of these two systems and that race is a factor in this difference.

摘要

“刑事定罪化”假说认为,精神病患者会被转至刑事司法系统,但这一假说很难得到证实。为数不多的相关研究仅考察了心理健康系统或刑事司法系统的某些方面,而非二者兼顾。本研究对州立医院收治情况与州立监狱收治精神病患者的情况进行了比较。各县之间存在相当大的差异。各县将其最大少数群体中患有精神疾病的成员送入监狱的人数超出预期。这些结果表明,不同司法管辖区在这两个系统的使用上存在差异,而且种族是造成这种差异的一个因素。

相似文献

1
Racial differences in the criminalization of the mentally ill.精神病患者刑事定罪中的种族差异。
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1994;22(3):411-20.
2
[The reliability of expert assessment: comparative study of hospitalized or imprisoned patients following criminal behavior].[专家评估的可靠性:对犯罪行为后住院或被监禁患者的比较研究]
Ann Med Psychol (Paris). 1992 Dec;150(10):741-5; discussion 745-6.
3
Modification of criminal law and its impact on psychiatric expert opinions.刑法修改及其对精神病学专家意见的影响。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 1998 Winter;21(1):109-16. doi: 10.1016/s0160-2527(97)00024-1.
4
An introduction to law relevant to mentally disordered offenders.与精神错乱罪犯相关的法律介绍。
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2004;14 Suppl 1:S12-8. doi: 10.1002/cbm.603.
5
Factors associated with the diversion of mentally disordered offenders.与精神错乱罪犯转处相关的因素。
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1994;22(3):389-97.
6
Competency courts: a creative solution for restoring competency to the competency process.能力法庭:恢复能力程序中能力的创造性解决方案。
Behav Sci Law. 2009 Sep-Oct;27(5):767-86. doi: 10.1002/bsl.890.
7
Psychiatric assessment at the magistrates' court. Early intervention is needed in the remand process.地方法院的精神病学评估。还押候审过程中需要早期干预。
Br J Psychiatry. 1994 Jun;164(6):722-4. doi: 10.1192/bjp.164.6.722.
8
[Penal aspects of psychiatric intervention: management modes and impact of new criminal legislation].[精神科干预的刑罚方面:新刑事立法的管理模式及影响]
Can J Commun Ment Health. 1995 Spring;14(1):103-22.
9
Mentally ill and non-mentally ill defendants' abilities to understand information relevant to adjudication: a preliminary study.患有精神疾病和未患精神疾病的被告理解与判决相关信息的能力:一项初步研究。
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1996;24(2):187-97.
10
The criminal justice outcomes of jail diversion programs for persons with mental illness: a review of the evidence.监狱精神病人分流计划的刑事司法结果:证据回顾。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2009;37(4):461-72.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementing the essential elements of a mental health court: the experiences of a large multijurisdictional suburban county.
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2010 Oct;37(4):427-42. doi: 10.1007/s11414-009-9193-z. Epub 2009 Oct 1.
2
The incarceration of individuals with severe mental disorders.对患有严重精神障碍者的监禁。
Community Ment Health J. 2001 Aug;37(4):361-72. doi: 10.1023/a:1017508826264.