• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肾移植中使用头孢曲松进行抗菌预防。对170例患者的前瞻性研究。

Antimicrobial prophylaxis with ceftriaxone in renal transplantation. Prospective study of 170 patients.

作者信息

Capocasale E, Mazzoni M P, Tondo S, D'Errico G

机构信息

Institute of General Surgery and Organ Transplantations, University of Parma, Italy.

出版信息

Chemotherapy. 1994;40(6):435-40. doi: 10.1159/000239305.

DOI:10.1159/000239305
PMID:7842829
Abstract

Due to their uremic state and altered host response induced by immunodepressive therapy, renal transplant recipients are particularly susceptible to infectious complications with high morbidity and mortality. We here report the results of a prospective study with 170 renal transplant patients, undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of ceftriaxone in the prevention of wound and early urinary tract infection. No wound infection was observed, however, 12 patients (7.1%) developed urinary tract infections. On the basis of these data, we recommend ceftriaxone prophylaxis as a safe and effective measure to prevent transplant wound infection and to reduce the incidence of postoperative urinary tract infection.

摘要

由于肾移植受者的尿毒症状态以及免疫抑制治疗引起的宿主反应改变,他们特别容易发生感染并发症,发病率和死亡率都很高。我们在此报告一项对170例肾移植患者进行的前瞻性研究结果,该研究旨在评估头孢曲松预防伤口感染和早期尿路感染的疗效。未观察到伤口感染,然而,有12例患者(7.1%)发生了尿路感染。基于这些数据,我们推荐使用头孢曲松进行预防,作为预防移植伤口感染和降低术后尿路感染发生率的一种安全有效的措施。

相似文献

1
Antimicrobial prophylaxis with ceftriaxone in renal transplantation. Prospective study of 170 patients.肾移植中使用头孢曲松进行抗菌预防。对170例患者的前瞻性研究。
Chemotherapy. 1994;40(6):435-40. doi: 10.1159/000239305.
2
Ceftriaxone (single dose) versus cefoxitin (multiple doses): success and failure of antibiotic prophylaxis in 1052 cesarean sections.
J Perinat Med. 1993;21(5):385-97. doi: 10.1515/jpme.1993.21.5.385.
3
Antimicrobial prophylaxis with ceftriaxone for prevention of early postoperative infections after 49 liver transplantations.
J Chemother. 2000 Sep;12 Suppl 3:10-6. doi: 10.1080/1120009x.2000.11782302.
4
[Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in transperitoneal tumor nephrectomy: does it lower the rate of clinically significant postoperative infections?].[经腹肿瘤肾切除术中的围手术期抗生素预防:它能降低具有临床意义的术后感染率吗?]
Urologe A. 2003 Jan;42(1):34-7. doi: 10.1007/s00120-002-0263-6. Epub 2002 Dec 19.
5
A randomized controlled trial comparing ceftriaxone with cefazolin for antibiotic prophylaxis in abdominal hysterectomy.一项比较头孢曲松与头孢唑林用于腹式子宫切除术抗生素预防的随机对照试验。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012 Oct;119(1):11-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.04.023. Epub 2012 Jul 10.
6
Use of single-dose perioperative antimicrobial therapy is acceptable in recipients of living-donor renal transplants in the rituximab era.在利妥昔单抗时代,单剂量围手术期抗菌治疗用于活体供肾移植受者是可接受的。
J Infect Chemother. 2019 Apr;25(4):247-252. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2018.11.013. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
7
[Antibiotic prophylaxis before kidney transplantation].
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 1990 Feb;8(2):74-7.
8
Ceftriaxone is more effective than gentamicin/metronidazole prophylaxis in reducing wound and urinary tract infections after bowel operations. Results of a controlled, randomized, blind clinical trial.
Dis Colon Rectum. 1993 Sep;36(9):826-33. doi: 10.1007/BF02047378.
9
Preoperative antimicrobial prophylaxis with a long-acting cephalosporin for thoracic surgery in 192 non small cell lung cancer patients.
J Chemother. 1998 Feb;10(1):58-63. doi: 10.1179/joc.1998.10.1.58.
10
Ceftriaxone in chemoprophylaxis and therapy of urinary tract infections.
Eur Surg Res. 1989;21 Suppl 1:36-42. doi: 10.1159/000129058.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical practice guidelines for the provision of renal service in Hong Kong: Infection Control in Renal Service.香港肾脏服务临床实践指南:肾脏服务中的感染控制
Nephrology (Carlton). 2019 Mar;24 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):98-129. doi: 10.1111/nep.13497.