Suppr超能文献

急性髓系白血病的诊断与血细胞分析仪VCS系统

Diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia and system Coulter VCS.

作者信息

Bruno A, Del Poeta G, Venditti A, Stasi R, Adorno G, Aronica G, Suppo G, Di Rienzo A M, Iazzoni R, Tribalto M

机构信息

Hematology Division, Tor Vergata University, S. Eugenio Hospital, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Haematologica. 1994 Sep-Oct;79(5):420-8.

PMID:7843628
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the possible contribution VCS could make in a hematological laboratory for the diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Peripheral blood samples from 42 AML patients and 58 normal donors were analyzed by flow cytometry with the VCS. Normal and leukemic peripheral blood samples were tested to establish a correlation between VCS data and the reference manual method. We evaluated the sensitivity threshold of the VCS for blast cell detection in progressively diluted samples. We looked at a correlation between different scatterplots and flags and the FAB classification of acute myeloid leukemia in order to identify a characteristic VCS image for each subtype. Thirty-four bone marrow samples (18 normal donors and 16 leukemic patients) were analyzed by the VCS system to demonstrate a characteristic scattergram distribution. Further, we tried to compare scatterplots to the flags of leukemic bone marrow samples and, finally, we compared VCS scatterplots with aberrant antigen expression in AML cases.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Overall VCS specificity was 93.1% (54/58) in peripheral blood samples; sensitivity was 100% (42/42) and VCS efficiency was 96%. In AML the characteristic X6 flag was observed in 95.23% of the cases (40/42). In peripheral samples discrimination was made between AML M1 with agranular blasts > 50% of the non erythroid cells (NEC), M4, M5 on the one hand, and AML M1 with granular blasts > 50% of NEC, M2, M3 on the other: the X5 flag was often present in the second group because of the different localization of the cells (p = 0.001). In all normal bone marrow samples we observed granuloblasts in different maturation stages in the neutrophil region of the DF1 VCS scatterplot corresponding to the X5X6 flags or, rarely, to the X5X6X1, because of the presence of immature erythroid cells. This association X5X6 was never observed alone in patients affected by AML. In our study, it was difficult to identify peculiar scatterplots and alarms for each FAB class of AML. Nevertheless, we observed that in all M4 and M5 FAB cases the blastic cells both in the peripheral blood and in the bone marrow samples were located in the monocyte region, with the frequent presence of the X3 flag often associated with the X6 flag. Eight out of the 16 AML bone marrow samples (1 FAB M0, 1 M2, 1 M3, 2 M4, 3 M5) showed the X2 flag and partial localization of blasts in the lymphoid region. In all these cases the presence of some small blastic cells with agranular cytoplasm was confirmed by morphological observation and cytochemical stainings.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是评估体积传导光散射(VCS)技术在血液学实验室对急性髓系白血病(AML)诊断可能做出的贡献。

材料与方法

采用VCS技术通过流式细胞术对42例AML患者和58例正常供者的外周血样本进行分析。对正常和白血病外周血样本进行检测,以建立VCS数据与参考手工方法之间的相关性。我们评估了在逐步稀释样本中VCS检测原始细胞的敏感性阈值。我们研究了不同散点图和标记与急性髓系白血病FAB分类之间的相关性,以便为每个亚型识别特征性的VCS图像。通过VCS系统对34份骨髓样本(18例正常供者和16例白血病患者)进行分析,以展示特征性的散点图分布。此外,我们试图将散点图与白血病骨髓样本的标记进行比较,最后,我们将VCS散点图与AML病例中的异常抗原表达进行比较。

结果与结论

在外周血样本中,VCS总体特异性为93.1%(54/58);敏感性为100%(42/42),VCS效率为96%。在AML中,95.23%的病例(40/42)观察到特征性的X6标记。在外周样本中,一方面区分了非红系细胞(NEC)中原始粒细胞>50%的AML M1、M4、M5,另一方面区分了NEC中原始粒细胞>50%的AML M1、M2、M3:由于细胞定位不同,第二组中常出现X5标记(p = 0.001)。在所有正常骨髓样本中,我们在DF1 VCS散点图的中性粒细胞区域观察到处于不同成熟阶段的早幼粒细胞,对应于X5X6标记,或很少对应于X5X6X1标记,这是由于存在未成熟红细胞。在AML患者中从未单独观察到这种X5X6关联。在我们的研究中,很难为AML的每个FAB类别识别出独特的散点图和警报。然而,我们观察到在所有FAB M4和M5病例中,外周血和骨髓样本中的原始细胞都位于单核细胞区域,经常出现X3标记且常与X6标记相关。16例AML骨髓样本中的8例(1例FAB M0、1例M2、1例M3、2例M4、3例M5)显示X2标记且原始细胞部分位于淋巴区域。在所有这些病例中,通过形态学观察和细胞化学染色证实存在一些胞质无颗粒的小原始细胞。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验