Davey P, Malek M, McMurdo M, Tarnow-Mordi W
Pharmacoeconomics Research Centre, University of Dundee, UK.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1994 Aug;34 Suppl A:129-43. doi: 10.1093/jac/34.suppl_a.129.
People are more vulnerable to infection at the extremes of age for a variety of reasons, the most important being that they are more likely to be in hospital in a crowded ward environment and to be at risk from hospital acquired infection. Recognition of this increased vulnerability to infection should be accompanied by equal emphasis on their increased susceptibility to nosocomial disease arising from the diagnosis or treatment of infection. An economic evaluation of infection at the extremes of age should include an assessment of need made in terms of the capacity of patients to benefit from investigation or treatment. Benefits should not be confused with treatment effects such as reduction in pyrexia or correction of other physiological abnormalities. Ideally benefits should be quantified in a manner which allows comparison with the cost-effectiveness of other uses of health care resources. In order to achieve this aim clinicians must understand the economic terms opportunity cost and marginal cost-effectiveness. These terms are defined in general terms and then applied to examples of investigation, prevention and treatment of infection at the extremes of age.
由于多种原因,处于年龄两端的人群更容易受到感染,其中最重要的原因是他们更有可能身处拥挤的病房环境中住院,并且面临医院获得性感染的风险。认识到这种感染易感性增加的同时,应同样重视他们因感染的诊断或治疗而对医院内疾病的易感性增加。对年龄两端人群的感染进行经济学评估时,应根据患者从检查或治疗中获益的能力进行需求评估。益处不应与诸如发热降低或其他生理异常纠正等治疗效果相混淆。理想情况下,益处应以一种能够与医疗保健资源其他用途的成本效益进行比较的方式进行量化。为了实现这一目标,临床医生必须理解经济术语机会成本和边际成本效益。这些术语将首先进行一般性定义,然后应用于年龄两端人群感染的检查、预防和治疗实例。