Hansen B C, Hansen K D
Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore 21201.
J Prof Nurs. 1995 Jan-Feb;11(1):31-9. doi: 10.1016/s8755-7223(95)80070-0.
The public attention to issues of academic and research misconduct requires that all faculty and students become familiar with the policy and procedural areas and roles of various officials in handling allegations of misconduct. Although the incidence of such misconduct seems to be small, issues of reporting, adjudication, rehabilitation, and deterrence are important to all with concern about the integrity of academic processes. Many issues concerning the management of allegations of academic or research misconduct remain unresolved. Examples include the definition of misconduct, provision for (or lack of) anonymity, the role of the whistleblower, the burden of proof, the statute of limitations, the nature and application of sanctions, and the processes of rehabilitation.
公众对学术和研究不端行为问题的关注要求所有教师和学生熟悉处理不当行为指控的政策、程序领域以及各类官员的职责。尽管此类不当行为的发生率似乎较低，但举报、裁决、整改和威慑等问题对于所有关注学术过程诚信的人来说都很重要。许多有关学术或研究不端行为指控管理的问题仍未得到解决。例如不当行为的定义、匿名规定（或缺乏匿名规定）、举报人作用、举证责任、诉讼时效、制裁的性质和适用以及整改程序。
