Friss L
University of Southern California.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1994 Fall;19(3):597-631. doi: 10.1215/03616878-19-3-597.
As early as 1915, leaders in the nursing profession were concerned with the "image problem of nurses," which they saw as needing improvement. Since then, countless studies, reports, and commissions have attempted to explain and solve perceived shortages of registered nurses, which have occurred regularly after brief periods of quiescence or oversupply. Usually, their recommendations have hinged on nurses changing their image. In fact, few of these studies have dealt with the real issues of nursing work, which are a narrow pay range, little extra pay for working on undesirable shifts, disincentives for full-time work, pay unrelated to education, and education unconnected to job level. The multiple studies and commissions do nothing more than recycle data and in the process obscure fundamental problems. Educational funding has been no more successful. Their ineffectiveness suggests the need for less "image enhancement" and more support from physicians and employers to bring about systemic reform. This includes licensing nurses according to their education, assigning them according to their competencies and education, and paying accordingly. These measures, and only these, will eventually curtail the cycles of nursing "shortages."
早在1915年,护理行业的领导者就关注“护士的形象问题”,他们认为这需要改进。从那时起,无数的研究、报告和委员会试图解释和解决注册护士明显的短缺问题,这些短缺问题在短暂的平静期或供应过剩之后经常出现。通常,他们的建议都取决于护士改变自己的形象。事实上,这些研究中很少涉及护理工作的实际问题,比如薪酬范围狭窄、在不受欢迎的班次工作几乎没有额外报酬、全职工作缺乏激励措施、薪酬与教育程度无关以及教育与工作水平脱节。众多的研究和委员会只不过是重复数据,在此过程中掩盖了基本问题。教育资金也没有取得更大成功。它们的无效表明需要减少“形象提升”,并需要医生和雇主给予更多支持以实现系统性改革。这包括根据护士的教育程度进行执照颁发,根据他们的能力和教育程度进行分配,并相应地支付薪酬。只有这些措施才能最终减少护理“短缺”的循环。