Tur-Kaspa H, Bryan T
School of Education, Tel Aviv University.
J Learn Disabil. 1995 Jan;28(1):44-52. doi: 10.1177/002221949502800107.
The purpose of this study was to examine whether teachers' judgments of students' social competence and school adjustment differentiated students with learning disabilities (LD) (n = 30; boys = 19, girls = 11) from low-achieving (LA) students (n = 29; boys = 17, girls = 12) and average-achieving (AA) students (n = 33; boys = 18, girls = 15) at two grade levels: third/fourth (mean age = 9.97, SD = 1.09) and seventh/eighth (mean age = 13.63, SD = .65). Teachers completed the Walker-McConnell Scale of Social Competence and School Adjustment for each student. They rated younger students with LD and LA students as having significantly lower social competence and school adjustment than their AA peers. In addition, the results supported the use of teacher ratings for initial screening and identification of elementary students at high risk for social-behavioral problems. However, teachers' ratings did not discriminate LD, LA, and AA students at the older grade levels. The discussion focuses on the utility of teachers' identification of social problems at different grade levels.
本研究的目的是考察教师对学生社会能力和学校适应能力的评判,是否能区分学习障碍(LD)学生(n = 30;男生 = 19,女生 = 11)与低成就(LA)学生(n = 29;男生 = 17,女生 = 12)以及中等成就(AA)学生(n = 33;男生 = 18,女生 = 15),涉及两个年级水平:三/四年级(平均年龄 = 9.97,标准差 = 1.09)和七/八年级(平均年龄 = 13.63,标准差 = 0.65)。教师针对每名学生完成了《沃克 - 麦康奈尔社会能力与学校适应量表》。他们评定,与中等成就的同龄人相比,有学习障碍的低年级学生和低成就学生的社会能力和学校适应能力显著更低。此外,研究结果支持利用教师评分对有社会行为问题高风险的小学生进行初步筛查和识别。然而,在较高年级水平上,教师评分无法区分学习障碍、低成就和中等成就的学生。讨论聚焦于教师在不同年级水平识别社会问题的效用。