de Pauw K W
Department of Psychiatry, Doncaster Royal Infirmary, UK.
Psychopathology. 1994;27(3-5):154-60. doi: 10.1159/000284864.
Over the last eight decades a plethora of psychodynamic explanations have been invoked to account for the Capgras delusion. While often ill-founded and convoluted, these formulations have, until recently, dominated many theoretical approaches to the phenomenon. Generally post hoc and teleological in nature, they postulate motives that are not introspectable and defence mechanisms that cannot be observed, measured or refuted. While psychosocial factors can and often do play a part in the development, content and course of the Capgras delusion in individual patients it remains to be proven that such factors are necessary and sufficient to account for delusional misidentification in general and the Capgras delusion in particular.
在过去的八十年里,人们提出了大量心理动力学解释来阐释卡普格拉妄想症。尽管这些解释往往毫无根据且错综复杂,但直到最近,它们在许多针对该现象的理论方法中仍占据主导地位。这些解释本质上通常是事后诸葛亮式的且带有目的论色彩,它们假定了一些无法通过内省察觉的动机以及一些无法被观察、测量或反驳的防御机制。虽然社会心理因素能够且常常在个体患者卡普格拉妄想症的发展、内容和病程中发挥作用,但要证明这些因素对于一般的妄想性错认尤其是卡普格拉妄想症来说是必要且充分的,仍有待证实。