Rinehart A L, Herzog C A, Collins A J, Flack J M, Ma J Z, Opsahl J A
Division of Nephrology, Hennepin County Medical Center, School of Medicine and Public Health, Minneapolis, MN 55404.
Am J Kidney Dis. 1995 Feb;25(2):281-90. doi: 10.1016/0272-6386(95)90010-1.
The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of angina, myocardial infarction (MI), cardiac death, and all-cause death following percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The study design was based on retrospective, nonrandomized analysis and was set in referral teaching hospitals and community hospitals. Eighty-four chronic dialysis patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease without prior revascularization were included in the study. Twenty-four patients underwent PTCA of one or more vessels, and 60 patients underwent CABG. Recurrence of angina, MI, cardiac death, and all-cause death following revascularization as well as the number of inpatient days preprocedure and postprocedure were recorded. The two patient groups were comparable in terms of age, sex, history of MI, left ventricular mass and function, and angina severity. Diabetes mellitus was more prevalent in the PTCA group. The CABG group had more severe coronary artery disease. The 2-year survival rate of the CABG patients (66%; 95% confidence interval = 53.79) did not differ from that of the PTCA patients (51%; 95% confidence interval = 27.65). Thirteen PTCA patients were restudied 106 +/- 108 days after recurrence of angina; nine (69%) of these patients were found to have angiographic restenosis. The postprocedure risk of angina and the combined endpoints of angina, MI, and cardiovascular death were significantly greater following PTCA than CABG. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty was the only consistent predictor of outcomes; the adjusted relative risks (compared with CABG) of postprocedure angina and combined endpoints were 16.4 and 10.2, respectively, and were several-fold higher than the unadjusted risks. We conclude that in chronic dialysis patients with symptomatic coronary disease, patients undergoing PTCA have a higher risk of subsequent angina and combined angina, MI, and cardiovascular death than those undergoing CABG. The optimal approach to coronary revascularization in this patient population remains to be determined.
本研究的目的是比较经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术(PTCA)或冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)后心绞痛、心肌梗死(MI)、心源性死亡和全因死亡的结局。该研究设计基于回顾性、非随机分析,在转诊教学医院和社区医院进行。84例有症状性冠状动脉疾病且未行过血运重建的慢性透析患者纳入研究。24例患者接受了单支或多支血管的PTCA,60例患者接受了CABG。记录血运重建后心绞痛、MI、心源性死亡和全因死亡的复发情况以及术前和术后的住院天数。两组患者在年龄、性别、MI病史、左心室质量和功能以及心绞痛严重程度方面具有可比性。糖尿病在PTCA组更为普遍。CABG组的冠状动脉疾病更为严重。CABG患者的2年生存率(66%;95%置信区间=53.79)与PTCA患者(51%;95%置信区间=27.65)无差异。13例PTCA患者在心绞痛复发后106±108天接受复查;其中9例(69%)患者发现有血管造影再狭窄。PTCA术后心绞痛风险以及心绞痛、MI和心血管死亡的联合终点显著高于CABG。经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术是唯一一致的结局预测因素;术后心绞痛和联合终点的调整相对风险(与CABG相比)分别为16.4和10.2,比未调整风险高几倍。我们得出结论,在有症状性冠状动脉疾病的慢性透析患者中,接受PTCA的患者随后发生心绞痛以及心绞痛、MI和心血管死亡联合发生的风险高于接受CABG的患者。该患者群体冠状动脉血运重建的最佳方法仍有待确定。