• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对提供家庭护理的医护人员针刺伤情况的分析。

Analysis of needlestick injuries to health care workers providing home care.

作者信息

Backinger C L, Koustenis G H

机构信息

Division of Professional Practices, Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, MD 20857.

出版信息

Am J Infect Control. 1994 Oct;22(5):300-6. doi: 10.1016/0196-6553(94)90017-5.

DOI:10.1016/0196-6553(94)90017-5
PMID:7847637
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This research analyzed needlestick injuries sustained by employees working in the home health environment to determine to what extent existing infection control policies and procedures in home health care are effective in reducing the risk of transmission of blood-borne infections.

METHODS

In June and July 1992, a random sample of 600 directors of home health care agencies in the United States were sent questionnaires concerning written blood-borne infection control policies and procedures of home health care agencies. Agency characteristics were also identified.

RESULTS

A 46% response rate (n = 278) was obtained. Of the 226 agencies that reported needlestick injury rates, 102 agencies reported no needlestick injuries to home health care agency employees in the "last year" and 124 agencies reported from one to 134 needlestick injuries, for a cumulative total of 475. Statistical analyses revealed that agencies with "safer" sharps containers, "safer" hypodermics, or "safer" access to intravenous administration lines did not have statistically significantly rates of lower needlestick injury than agencies without these "safer" products.

CONCLUSIONS

This study should be considered exploratory; causal relationships cannot be established. Although written blood-borne infection control policies and procedures do not appear to provide protection to home health care workers from the risk of needlestick injury, limitations in the data exist. Consequently, results should be viewed with caution and additional research is needed.

摘要

背景

本研究分析了在家庭健康环境中工作的员工所遭受的针刺伤,以确定家庭健康护理中现有的感染控制政策和程序在降低血源感染传播风险方面的有效程度。

方法

1992年6月和7月,随机抽取了600名美国家庭健康护理机构的主任,向他们发送了有关家庭健康护理机构书面血源感染控制政策和程序的问卷。还确定了机构的特征。

结果

获得了46%的回复率(n = 278)。在报告了针刺伤发生率的226家机构中,102家机构报告在“去年”其家庭健康护理机构员工未发生针刺伤,124家机构报告发生了1至134次针刺伤,累计总数为475次。统计分析显示,配备“更安全”锐器盒、“更安全”皮下注射器或“更安全”静脉输液通路的机构,其针刺伤发生率在统计学上并不显著低于没有这些“更安全”产品的机构。

结论

本研究应被视为探索性的;无法建立因果关系。尽管书面血源感染控制政策和程序似乎并未为家庭健康护理工作者提供免受针刺伤风险的保护,但数据存在局限性。因此,对结果应谨慎看待,还需要进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Analysis of needlestick injuries to health care workers providing home care.对提供家庭护理的医护人员针刺伤情况的分析。
Am J Infect Control. 1994 Oct;22(5):300-6. doi: 10.1016/0196-6553(94)90017-5.
2
Occupational exposure to needlestick injuries and hepatitis B vaccination coverage among health care workers in Egypt.埃及医护人员的职业性针刺伤暴露情况及乙肝疫苗接种覆盖率
Am J Infect Control. 2003 Dec;31(8):469-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2003.03.003.
3
Sharps injuries in the home health care setting: risks for home health care workers.家庭医疗保健环境中的锐器伤:家庭医疗保健工作者面临的风险。
AAOHN J. 2004 Mar;52(3):102-8.
4
Bloodborne pathogens. What you need to know--Part I.血源性病原体。你需要了解的内容——第一部分。
AAOHN J. 2003 Jan;51(1):38-45; quiz 46-7.
5
The epidemiology of needlestick and sharp instrument accidents in a Nigerian hospital.尼日利亚一家医院针刺伤和锐器伤事故的流行病学情况。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1994 Jan;15(1):27-31. doi: 10.1086/646814.
6
Occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens: request for information--OSHA. Request for information.职业接触血源性病原体:信息请求——职业安全与健康管理局。信息请求。
Fed Regist. 1998 Sep 9;63(174):48250-2.
7
Management of health care workers following occupational exposure to hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and human immunodeficiency virus.医护人员职业暴露于乙肝、丙肝及人类免疫缺陷病毒后的处理
Hong Kong Med J. 2016 Oct;22(5):472-7. doi: 10.12809/hkmj164897. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
8
Needlestick injury and accidental exposure to blood: the need for improving the hepatitis B vaccination grade among health care workers outside the hospital.针刺伤和意外接触血液:提高医院外医护人员乙肝疫苗接种率的必要性。
Am J Infect Control. 2006 Nov;34(9):610-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2006.02.004.
9
Occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens; needlestick and other sharps injuries; final rule. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Department of Labor. Final rule; request for comment on the Information Collection (Paperwork) Requirements.职业接触血源性病原体;针刺伤和其他锐器伤;最终规则。美国劳工部职业安全与健康管理局(OSHA)。最终规则;关于信息收集(文书工作)要求的征求意见。
Fed Regist. 2001 Jan 18;66(12):5318-25.
10
Needlestick and sharps injuries among health-care workers in Taiwan.台湾医护人员的针刺伤和锐器伤。
Epidemiol Infect. 1999 Apr;122(2):259-65. doi: 10.1017/s0950268899002186.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers and facilitators to infection prevention practices in home healthcare: a scoping review and proposed implementation framework.家庭医疗保健中感染预防措施的障碍与促进因素:一项范围综述及拟议的实施框架
Infect Prev Pract. 2024 Jan 30;6(1):100342. doi: 10.1016/j.infpip.2024.100342. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
Risk of Sharps Injuries to Home Care Nurses and Aides: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.家庭护理护士和助手的锐器伤风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Occup Environ Med. 2017 Nov;59(11):1072-1077. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001160.
3
Sharps injuries and other blood and body fluid exposures among home health care nurses and aides.
家庭健康护理护士和助理中的锐器伤以及其他血液和体液暴露情况。
Am J Public Health. 2009 Nov;99 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S710-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.150169.