Fallert M, Baum K
Pflugers Arch. 1976 Aug 24;364(3):269-84. doi: 10.1007/BF00581765.
In anesthetized rabbits, spirogram and diaphragmatic activity were examined during electrical stimulation of the bulbar lateral reticular formation. The activity of bulbar respiratory neurons was recorded contra- or ipsilaterally to the stimulation site. One volley of repetitive stimuli per breath was delivered during either inspiration of expiration. 1. Each volley of about 120 ms duration at 100 pulses per second, delivered early in inspiration, caused an immediate and transient inhibition of the diaphragmatic activity. An inspiratory rebound comprising lengthening of inspiration and increase in tidal volume occurred. a) "Inspiratory" and "expiratory-inspiratory" phase-spanning neurons exhibited inhibition during the volley. The burst discharge was lengthened and the spike density increased after stimulus. The same was true of some "inspiratory-expiratory" phase-spanning units. b) The discharge of most of the "inspiratory-expiratory neurons was not inhibited. "Expiratory" units were excited. In both types of cells activation occurred which outlasted the volley. 2. When applied during expiration, the volley caused a short inspiratory twitch. a) "Inspiratory" and "expiratory-inspiratory" neurons exhibited a short post-stimulus firing and the spike density was increased. In some units of the latter type, however, the burst discharge was shortened. b) Most of the "expiratory" and "inspiratory-expiratory" neurons were not inhibited by the volley. Cells of the former type often produced post-stimulus after-discharge; the burst discharge of units belonging to the latter type was shortened. The effects of expiratory stimuli upon neuronal activity, however, were less consistent than those elicited by inspiratory volleys. 3. During spontaneous irregularities of single inspirations (short interruptions), EI and I neurons exhibited comparable burst pattern changes. The changes in pattern of IE and E units were also comparable and differed distinctly from the behaviour of the EI and I cells. No major differences in behaviour were observed between neurons which were inhibited during lung inflation (alpha units) and those which were activated during inflation (beta cells). The findings are in accord with the effects observed during electrical bulbar stimulation, suggesting that EI and I units are inspiratory-activating cells, whereas IE and E neurons may have an inspiratory-inhibitory function. 4. The conclusion is drawn that the effects of bulbar stimulation on the respiratory movements are the result of manipulation on intrinsic rhythmogenesis.
在麻醉的家兔中,在电刺激延髓外侧网状结构期间检查了呼吸图和膈肌活动。记录延髓呼吸神经元在刺激部位对侧或同侧的活动。在吸气或呼气期间,每次呼吸给予一组重复刺激。1. 每秒100次脉冲、持续时间约120毫秒的每组刺激,在吸气早期给予时,会立即引起膈肌活动的短暂抑制。出现了包括吸气延长和潮气量增加的吸气反弹。a) “吸气”和“呼气 - 吸气”跨相神经元在刺激组期间表现出抑制。刺激后爆发放电延长,峰值密度增加。一些“吸气 - 呼气”跨相单位也是如此。b) 大多数“吸气 - 呼气”神经元的放电未受抑制。“呼气”单位被兴奋。在这两种类型的细胞中都发生了持续超过刺激组的激活。2. 当在呼气期间施加刺激组时,会引起短暂的吸气抽搐。a) “吸气”和“呼气 - 吸气”神经元表现出短暂的刺激后放电,峰值密度增加。然而,在后者类型的一些单位中,爆发放电缩短。b) 大多数“呼气”和“吸气 - 呼气”神经元未被刺激组抑制。前一种类型的细胞经常产生刺激后放电;属于后一种类型的单位的爆发放电缩短。然而,呼气刺激对神经元活动的影响不如吸气刺激组引起的影响一致。3. 在单次吸气的自发不规则(短暂中断)期间,EI和I神经元表现出可比的爆发模式变化。IE和E单位的模式变化也可比,并且与EI和I细胞的行为明显不同。在肺充气期间被抑制的神经元(α单位)和在充气期间被激活的神经元(β细胞)之间未观察到行为上的主要差异。这些发现与延髓电刺激期间观察到的效应一致,表明EI和I单位是吸气激活细胞,而IE和E神经元可能具有吸气抑制功能。4. 得出的结论是,延髓刺激对呼吸运动的影响是对内在节律发生进行操纵的结果。