Albers B A, Patka P, Haarman H J, Kostense P J
Abteilung Chirurgie/Traumatologie, Freien Universität Amsterdam.
Unfallchirurg. 1994 Dec;97(12):625-8.
Antibiotic prophylaxis in closed fractures is cost-effective if the risk of a deep infection is reduced by 0.25%. This control study was undertaken to assess the cost-effectiveness of prophylaxis of postoperative infections after surgical treatment of closed fractures. The costs for 16 patients with infections (8 with deep infections, 8 with superficial infections) were investigated and compared with the costs for 16 similar but non-infected patients with special reference to length of hospital stay, antibiotics and surgery. The data were collected from the trauma department of the University Hospital of the Free University in Amsterdam. Costs in the group of 8 patients with superficial wound infection were not substantially higher than those for their non-infected controls. The occurrence of a deep infection meant costs an average of DFL 35,224 higher than an uneventful postoperative course. On the basis of these results, antibiotic prophylaxis of postoperative wound infections is cost-effective if it reduces the risk of deep wound infections by about 0.25%.
如果深部感染风险降低0.25%,闭合性骨折的抗生素预防是具有成本效益的。本对照研究旨在评估闭合性骨折手术治疗后预防术后感染的成本效益。调查了16例感染患者(8例深部感染,8例浅表感染)的费用,并与16例类似但未感染患者的费用进行比较,特别参考住院时间、抗生素和手术情况。数据收集自阿姆斯特丹自由大学大学医院的创伤科。8例浅表伤口感染患者组的费用并不比未感染对照组高很多。深部感染的发生意味着费用平均比术后顺利恢复的情况高出35224荷兰盾。基于这些结果,如果抗生素预防能将深部伤口感染风险降低约0.25%,那么预防术后伤口感染是具有成本效益的。