Gillespie William J, Walenkamp Geert Him
Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Cottingham Road, Hull, UK, HU6 7RX.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Mar 17;2010(3):CD000244. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000244.pub2.
Surgical site infection and other hospital-acquired infections cause significant morbidity after internal fixation of fractures. The administration of antibiotics may reduce the frequency of infections.
To determine whether the prophylactic administration of antibiotics in people undergoing surgical management of hip or other closed long bone fractures reduces the incidence of surgical site and other hospital-acquired infections.
We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register (December 2009), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2009, Issue 4), MEDLINE (1950 to November 2009), EMBASE (1988 to December 2009), other electronic databases including the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (December 2009), conferences proceedings and reference lists of articles.
Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing any regimen of systemic antibiotic prophylaxis administered at the time of surgery, compared with no prophylaxis, placebo, or a regimen of different duration, in people with a hip fracture undergoing surgery for internal fixation or prosthetic replacement, or with any closed long bone fracture undergoing internal fixation. All trials needed to report surgical site infection.
Two authors independently screened papers for inclusion, assessed risk of bias and extracted data. Pooled data are presented graphically.
Data from 8447 participants in 23 studies were included in the analyses. In people undergoing surgery for closed fracture fixation, single dose antibiotic prophylaxis significantly reduced deep surgical site infection (risk ratio 0.40, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.67), superficial surgical site infections, urinary infections, and respiratory tract infections. Multiple dose prophylaxis had an effect of similar size on deep surgical site infection (risk ratio 0.35, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.62), but significant effects on urinary and respiratory infections were not confirmed. Although the risk of bias in many studies as reported was unclear, sensitivity analysis showed that removal from the meta-analyses of studies at high risk of bias did not alter the conclusions. Economic modelling using data from one large trial indicated that single dose prophylaxis with ceftriaxone is a cost-effective intervention. Data for the incidence of adverse effects were very limited, but as expected they appeared to be more common in those receiving antibiotics, compared with placebo or no prophylaxis.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic prophylaxis should be offered to those undergoing surgery for closed fracture fixation.
手术部位感染及其他医院获得性感染在骨折内固定术后会导致显著的发病率。使用抗生素可能会降低感染发生率。
确定在接受髋关节或其他闭合性长骨骨折手术治疗的患者中预防性使用抗生素是否能降低手术部位感染及其他医院获得性感染的发生率。
我们检索了Cochrane骨、关节与肌肉创伤组专业注册库(2009年12月)、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(《Cochrane图书馆》2009年第4期)、MEDLINE(1950年至2009年11月)、EMBASE(1988年至2009年12月)、其他电子数据库,包括世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台(2009年12月)、会议论文集以及文章的参考文献列表。
随机或半随机对照试验,比较在接受内固定手术或假体置换的髋部骨折患者,或接受内固定的任何闭合性长骨骨折患者中,手术时给予任何全身性抗生素预防方案与不预防、安慰剂或不同疗程方案的效果。所有试验均需报告手术部位感染情况。
两位作者独立筛选纳入的论文,评估偏倚风险并提取数据。汇总数据以图表形式呈现。
23项研究中的8447名参与者的数据纳入了分析。在接受闭合性骨折固定手术的患者中,单剂量抗生素预防显著降低了深部手术部位感染(风险比0.40,95%可信区间0.24至0.67)、浅表手术部位感染、泌尿系统感染和呼吸道感染。多剂量预防对深部手术部位感染有相似程度的影响(风险比0.35,95%可信区间0.19至0.62),但对泌尿系统和呼吸道感染的显著影响未得到证实。尽管报告的许多研究中的偏倚风险尚不清楚,但敏感性分析表明,从偏倚风险高的研究中剔除后进行的荟萃分析并未改变结论。使用一项大型试验的数据进行的经济模型分析表明,头孢曲松单剂量预防是一种具有成本效益的干预措施。不良反应发生率的数据非常有限,但正如预期的那样,与安慰剂或不预防相比,接受抗生素治疗的患者中不良反应似乎更常见。
对于接受闭合性骨折固定手术的患者应给予抗生素预防。