Suppr超能文献

进餐和剂型改变对茶碱从24小时缓释给药系统中生物利用度的影响。

Effect of meals and dosage-form modification on theophylline bioavailability from a 24-hour sustained-release delivery system.

作者信息

González M A, Straughan A B

机构信息

P'-Kinetics Inc., Pembroke Pines, Florida.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 1994 Sep-Oct;16(5):804-14.

PMID:7859239
Abstract

The bioavailability of theophylline from an extended-release formulation (Uni-Dur) intended for once-daily administration was assessed in a randomized, single-dose, five-way crossover study to determine the effects of food and breaking the tablet, and the bioequivalence of two dosage strengths. The five treatments given at 1-week intervals were (1) immediate-release theophylline (Slo-Phyllin) 5 x 100 mg to fasting subjects as a reference treatment; (2) sustained-release Uni-Dur 600-mg theophylline tablet to fasting subjects; (3) Uni-Dur 600-mg tablet after a high-fat meal; (4) Uni-Dur 600-mg dose administered as two half tablets to fasting subjects; and (5) Uni-Dur 400-mg tablet to fasting subjects. Serial blood samples were collected immediately before and for 57 hours after dosing. The mean relative extents of absorption for the four Uni-Dur treatments were not significantly different from Slo-Phyllin treatment or from each other (84.30 +/- 23.6%, 600 mg, fasting; 88.73 +/- 18.63%, 600 mg, fed; 93.65 +/- 19.67%, half tablet; and 92.87 +/- 19.5%, 400 mg, fasting). The maximum theophylline serum concentrations with Uni-Dur were significantly lower and the times to reach peak concentrations were significantly longer than with Slo-Phyllin. Differences noted among the four Uni-Dur treatments were as follows: the time to peak theophylline concentration was significantly longer in the fed state (17.09 hours) as were the times to 50% (11.73 hours) and 80% (18.46 hours) absorption compared with fasting (13.57 hours, 8.57 hours, and 14.07 hours, respectively). The Uni-Dur 400-mg treatment resulted in a significantly higher maximum theophylline serum concentration (6.64 mu g/mL) compared with the Uni-Dur 600-mg fasting treatment (5.33 mu g/mL); however, the correlation between in vivo and in vitro data supports the bioequivalence of the two strengths. This study shows that theophylline is slowly and consistently absorbed from the Uni-Dur 24-hour sustained-release form, and food or breaking the tablet does not alter the extent of absorption. Thus Uni-Dur potentially provides greater ease of administration and convenience for patients while maintaining therapeutic theophylline serum levels over the 24-hour dosing interval.

摘要

在一项随机、单剂量、五交叉试验中,评估了一种每日服用一次的缓释制剂(优喘平)中茶碱的生物利用度,以确定食物和掰开片剂的影响以及两种剂量规格的生物等效性。每隔1周给予的五种治疗方法如下:(1)给空腹受试者服用速溶茶碱(舒弗美)5×100mg作为参比治疗;(2)给空腹受试者服用优喘平600mg缓释片;(3)高脂餐后服用优喘平600mg片剂;(4)给空腹受试者服用两片半的优喘平600mg剂量;(5)给空腹受试者服用优喘平400mg片剂。给药前及给药后57小时内连续采集血样。优喘平四种治疗方法的平均相对吸收程度与舒弗美治疗相比或相互之间均无显著差异(600mg,空腹,84.30±23.6%;600mg,进食,88.73±18.63%;半片,93.65±19. .67%;400mg,空腹,92.87±19.5%)。与舒弗美相比,优喘平的最大血清茶碱浓度显著较低,达到峰值浓度的时间显著较长。优喘平四种治疗方法之间的差异如下:与空腹状态(分别为13.57小时、8.57小时和14.07小时)相比,进食状态下达到茶碱浓度峰值的时间(17.09小时)以及达到50%(11.73小时)和80%(18.46小时)吸收的时间显著延长。与优喘平600mg空腹治疗(5.33μg/mL)相比,优喘平400mg治疗导致的最大血清茶碱浓度显著更高(6.64μg/mL);然而,体内和体外数据之间的相关性支持两种规格的生物等效性。本研究表明,茶碱从优喘平24小时缓释剂型中吸收缓慢且持续,食物或掰开片剂不会改变吸收程度。因此,优喘平在24小时给药间隔内维持治疗性血清茶碱水平的同时,可能为患者提供更大的用药便利性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验