Kaufmann R B, Peyser P A, Sheedy P F, Rumberger J A, Schwartz R S
Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Mar 1;25(3):626-32. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)00435-S.
This study attempted to 1) evaluate five quantitative measures of coronary artery calcium and determine which best agreed with coronary artery disease severity at angiography; and 2) determine optimal quantity cutpoints to distinguish among no, mild and significant disease.
Coronary artery calcium identified noninvasively by electron beam computed tomography is a sensitive marker for atherosclerosis. Quantitative assessments of calcium could distinguish among patients with no, mild and significant disease in clinical, screening and research settings.
One hundred sixty patients, 23 to 59 years old, underwent coronary angiography and electron beam computed tomography. Coronary artery calcium was defined as dense (> 130 Hounsfield units) foci > or = 2 mm2 on the tomogram. Regression and receiver operating characteristic analyses were used to evaluate five quantitative measures of calcium as predictors of the largest stenosis in the coronary arteries and to identify optimal cutpoints for distinguishing among disease categories. No disease was defined as no stenosis, mild disease as 10% to 49% diameter stenosis in one or more major branches and significant disease as > or = 50% diameter stenosis in one or more major branches.
All measures evaluated performed well. With calcific area as the quantitative measure, the best cutpoint for discriminating between patients with and without disease was the presence of calcium: sensitivity 81%, specificity 86% and overall accuracy 83%. The best cutpoint for discriminating between patients with and without significant disease was 18 mm2: sensitivity 86%, specificity 81% and accuracy 83%.
Because the ranges of calcium quantity overlapped across disease categories, no cutpoints would distinguish among categories with absolute certainty. However, selected cutpoints could rule out disease in most healthy subjects and identify most patients with significant disease.
本研究试图1)评估冠状动脉钙化的五项定量指标,并确定哪一项与血管造影时的冠状动脉疾病严重程度最相符;2)确定区分无疾病、轻度疾病和重度疾病的最佳数量切点。
通过电子束计算机断层扫描无创识别的冠状动脉钙化是动脉粥样硬化的敏感标志物。钙的定量评估可在临床、筛查和研究环境中区分无疾病、轻度疾病和重度疾病的患者。
160名年龄在23至59岁之间的患者接受了冠状动脉造影和电子束计算机断层扫描。冠状动脉钙化定义为断层图像上密度大于130亨氏单位、面积大于或等于2平方毫米的致密病灶。采用回归分析和受试者操作特征分析来评估钙的五项定量指标作为冠状动脉最大狭窄预测指标的情况,并确定区分疾病类别的最佳切点。无疾病定义为无狭窄,轻度疾病定义为一个或多个主要分支直径狭窄10%至49%,重度疾病定义为一个或多个主要分支直径狭窄大于或等于50%。
所有评估指标表现良好。以钙化面积作为定量指标,区分有疾病和无疾病患者的最佳切点是存在钙化:敏感性81%,特异性86%,总体准确性83%。区分有重度疾病和无重度疾病患者的最佳切点是18平方毫米:敏感性86%,特异性81%,准确性83%。
由于不同疾病类别之间钙量范围存在重叠,没有切点能绝对确定地区分不同类别。然而,选定的切点可在大多数健康受试者中排除疾病,并识别出大多数重度疾病患者。