Feng Y Z, Tseng Y T, Jaw S P, Hoskins B, Ho I K
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson 39216.
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1994 Nov;49(3):649-55. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(94)90083-3.
In order to evaluate and to compare the time course, dose response, and the degree of tolerance development to butorphanol and morphine, rats were continuously intracerebroventricularly (ICV) infused with saline vehicle (1 microliter/h), butorphanol (6.5, 13, 26, and 52 nmol/microliters/h), or morphine (1.6, 6.5, and 26 nmol/microliters/h) through osmotic minipumps for 1 to 3 days. The tail-flick responses were determined pre-, during, and postinfusion. Tolerance to morphine developed faster than that to butorphanol. The antinociceptive response to the ICV challenge dose (6 h after the termination of drug infusion) of butorphanol or morphine was decreased significantly and there was a negative correlation between the dose of the drug infused and the observed antinociceptive response. In terms of butorphanol and morphine tolerance, a parallel rightward shift in the dose-response curve was produced with the degree of shift proportional to the log of the infusion dose. In tail-flick tests, the shifts of the dose-response curves for butorphanol and morphine in tolerant animals were 11.8- and 46.3-fold, respectively. However, in the acetic acid writhing test, the shifts of the dose-response curves for butorphanol and morphine in tolerant animals were 11.3- and 11.7-fold, respectively. These results suggest that there is a greater degree of tolerance to morphine than there is to butorphanol, but the degree of butorphanol tolerance is still substantial. In addition, two pain assays (tail flick vs. writhing) yielded different estimations of tolerance in a comparison of morphine and butorphanol.
为了评估和比较布托啡诺和吗啡的时程、剂量反应以及耐受性发展程度,通过渗透微型泵向大鼠脑室内(ICV)连续输注生理盐水载体(1微升/小时)、布托啡诺(6.5、13、26和52纳摩尔/微升/小时)或吗啡(1.6、6.5和26纳摩尔/微升/小时),持续1至3天。在输注前、输注期间和输注后测定甩尾反应。吗啡耐受性的发展比布托啡诺更快。对布托啡诺或吗啡的脑室内激发剂量(药物输注终止后6小时)的抗伤害感受反应显著降低,并且输注药物的剂量与观察到的抗伤害感受反应之间存在负相关。就布托啡诺和吗啡耐受性而言,剂量反应曲线平行向右移动,移动程度与输注剂量的对数成正比。在甩尾试验中,耐受性动物中布托啡诺和吗啡的剂量反应曲线的移动分别为11.8倍和46.3倍。然而,在醋酸扭体试验中,耐受性动物中布托啡诺和吗啡的剂量反应曲线的移动分别为11.3倍和11.7倍。这些结果表明,吗啡的耐受性程度比布托啡诺更高,但布托啡诺的耐受性程度仍然相当大。此外,在比较吗啡和布托啡诺时,两种疼痛测定法(甩尾与扭体)对耐受性的估计不同。