Bradbeer J N, Lindsay P C, Reeve J
University Department of Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, England.
J Bone Miner Res. 1994 Nov;9(11):1679-86. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.5650091103.
We investigated the determinants of bone formation at individual remodeling sites (BMUs) in cancellous bone from 8 osteologically normal, sex hormone-replete women with endometriosis. All were tetracycline double-labeled (2, 12, 2, and 4 day regime) before iliac bone biopsy. At each BMU the mineral apposition rate (MAR) was determined conventionally from the distance between label midpoints (MAR 1) and also from the distance between the mineralization front and the trailing edge of the second label (MAR 2). MAR 1 and 2 were compared with within-BMU measurements of osteoid width (O.Wi) and the activities of osteoblastic alkaline phosphatase (AP) and succinic dehydrogenase (SDH, an enzyme in the Krebs cycle), both quantitated by microdensitometry. A total of 143 BMUs were evaluated, of which 88 were satisfactory for all measurements and 132 were satisfactory for all but SDH. There was a weak correlation (r = 0.34) between MAR 1 and 2 at individual sites, with a mean difference of 0.49 micron/day (mean MAR 0.82 micron/day). The mean MAR of individual subjects tended to be either increasing or decreasing (F = 16.1, p < 0.01). In linear regressions, MAR 2 was statistically dependent on O.Wi, AP, and SDH (73% of the variance accounted for). In contrast, MAR 1 was weakly correlated with O.Wi and only 30% of its variance was accounted for by AP, SDH, and O.Wi. The variance in the MAR 2 data was inversely increased (p < 0.01) compared with MAR 1 as the number of days of bone formation represented.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
我们研究了8名骨骼学上正常、性激素水平充足的子宫内膜异位症女性松质骨中各个重塑部位(骨多单元)的骨形成决定因素。在进行髂骨活检前,所有患者均接受四环素双标记(2、12、2和4天方案)。在每个骨多单元,传统上通过标记中点之间的距离(MAR 1)以及矿化前沿与第二个标记后缘之间的距离(MAR 2)来确定矿物质沉积率(MAR)。将MAR 1和MAR 2与骨多单元内骨样宽度(O.Wi)以及成骨碱性磷酸酶(AP)和琥珀酸脱氢酶(SDH,三羧酸循环中的一种酶)的活性进行比较,二者均通过显微密度测定法定量。总共评估了143个骨多单元,其中88个对所有测量均令人满意,132个除SDH外对所有测量均令人满意。各个部位的MAR 1和MAR 2之间存在弱相关性(r = 0.34),平均差异为0.49微米/天(平均MAR为0.82微米/天)。各个受试者的平均MAR倾向于升高或降低(F = 16.1,p < 0.01)。在线性回归中,MAR 2在统计学上依赖于O.Wi、AP和SDH(占方差的73%)。相比之下,MAR 1与O.Wi的相关性较弱,其方差只有30%由AP、SDH和O.Wi解释。随着所代表的骨形成天数增加,与MAR 1相比,MAR 2数据中的方差呈反向增加(p < 0.01)。(摘要截断于250字)