Acebal Lucía J, Paez Borda A, Herrero Payo A, Bustamante Alarma S, Sánchez Sánchez E, Berenguer Sanchez A
Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Madrid, España.
Arch Esp Urol. 1994 Dec;47(10):969-72.
An efficient compression can reduce the complications of an inadequate hemostasis following scrotal surgery. The main difference between the "sumo" and previously described compressive methods lies in the use of both pelvic brims as main loading points for the dressing. Similar features are provided by standard scrotal supports but the compression they are able to achieve is minimal compared to that of "sumo" dressing.
有效的加压包扎可减少阴囊手术后止血不充分带来的并发症。“相扑式”包扎法与先前描述的加压方法的主要区别在于，使用双侧骨盆边缘作为敷料的主要着力点。标准的阴囊支撑装置也有类似功能，但与“相扑式”包扎法相比，其所能达到的压力极小。
